| HiSilicon Kirin 930 | Qualcomm Snapdragon QM215 | |
| Max TDP | ||
| NA | Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA |
| NA | Running cost per day | NA |
| NA | Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA |
| NA | Running cost per year | NA |
HiSilicon Kirin 930 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon QM215
The HiSilicon Kirin 930 operates with 8 cores and 8 CPU threads. It run at 2.00 GHz base 1.50 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at .The processor is attached to the N/A CPU socket. This version includes -- of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support LPDDR3-1600 RAM and features PCIe Gen lanes. Tjunction keeps below -- degrees C. In particular, Cortex-A53 / Cortex-A53 Architecture is enhanced with 28 nm technology and supports None. The product was launched on Q1/2015
The Qualcomm Snapdragon QM215 operates with 453 cores and 8 CPU threads. It run at -- base all cores while the TDP is set at .The processor is attached to the N/A CPU socket. This version includes -- of L3 cache on one chip, supports 1 memory channels to support LPDDR3-667 RAM and features PCIe Gen lanes. Tjunction keeps below -- degrees C. In particular, Cortex-A53 Architecture is enhanced with 28 nm technology and supports None. The product was launched on Q3/2019
HiSilicon Kirin 930
Qualcomm Snapdragon QM215
Compare Detail
| 2.00 GHz | Frequency | 1.30 GHz |
| 8 | Cores | 453 |
| 2.00 GHz | Turbo (1 Core) | -- |
| 1.50 GHz | Turbo (All Cores) | |
 No |
Hyperthreading | No |
| No |
Overclocking | No |
| hybrid (big.LITTLE) | Core Architecture | normal |
| ARM Mali-T628 MP4 | GPU | Qualcomm Adreno 308 |
| 0.60 GHz | GPU (Turbo) | 0.50 GHz |
| 28 nm | Technology | 28 nm |
| 0.60 GHz | GPU (Turbo) | 0.50 GHz |
| 11 | DirectX Version | 11 |
| 1 | Max. displays | 0 |
| LPDDR3-1600 | Memory | LPDDR3-667 |
| 2 | Memory channels | 1 |
| Max memory | ||
| No |
ECC | No |
| -- | L2 Cache | -- |
| -- | L3 Cache | -- |
| PCIe version | ||
| PCIe lanes | ||
| 28 nm | Technology | 28 nm |
| N/A | Socket | N/A |
| TDP | ||
| None | Virtualization | None |
| Q1/2015 | Release date | Q3/2019 |
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
HiSilicon Kirin 930
78 (0%)
Qualcomm Snapdragon QM215
25 (0%)
Electric Usage Estimate
Electric Usage Estimate
Popular Comparision
HiSilicon Kirin 930 vs
Apple A13 Bionic
HiSilicon Kirin 930 vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon QM215
Apple M1 vs
HiSilicon Kirin 930
HiSilicon Kirin 930 vs
Intel Core i7-8557U
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 non LTE vs
HiSilicon Kirin 930
HiSilicon Kirin 930 vs
Intel Core i7-11700
HiSilicon Kirin 930 vs
Intel Core i3-8100
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 vs
HiSilicon Kirin 930
HiSilicon Kirin 930 vs
AMD Epyc 7452
HiSilicon Kirin 930 vs
Intel Core i7-4770R
HiSilicon Kirin 930 vs
Intel Celeron 1037U
HiSilicon Kirin 930 vs
Intel Core i5-3470S
Intel Core i5-6500 vs
HiSilicon Kirin 930
HiSilicon Kirin 930 vs
Intel Core i3-5010U
HiSilicon Kirin 930 vs
AMD Ryzen 3 3200U
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon QM215
Apple A13 Bionic vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon QM215
Qualcomm Snapdragon QM215 vs
AMD Ryzen Embedded V2546
HiSilicon Kirin 960 vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon QM215
Intel Atom x6211E vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon QM215
HiSilicon Kirin 930 vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon QM215
Qualcomm Snapdragon QM215 vs
Intel Xeon E-2254ML
Qualcomm Snapdragon QM215 vs
Intel Celeron J1750
Intel Core i3-6102E vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon QM215
Qualcomm Snapdragon QM215 vs
Intel Xeon Gold 6142F
AMD E-240 vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon QM215
Qualcomm Snapdragon QM215 vs
Intel Core i5-2400
Qualcomm Snapdragon QM215 vs
Intel Xeon E3-1245 v5
Samsung Exynos 990 vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon QM215
Qualcomm Snapdragon QM215 vs
AMD A10-7850K
Comments
