| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 | Intel Xeon E5-2687W v2 | |
| Max TDP | 150 W | |
| NA | Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA |
| NA | Running cost per day | NA |
| NA | Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA |
| NA | Running cost per year | NA |
Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 vs Intel Xeon E5-2687W v2
The Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 operates with 8 cores and 8 CPU threads. It run at 1.80 GHz base 1.40 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at .The processor is attached to the N/A CPU socket. This version includes -- of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support LPDDR3-933 RAM and features PCIe Gen lanes. Tjunction keeps below -- degrees C. In particular, Cortex-A72 / Cortex-A53 Architecture is enhanced with 28 nm technology and supports None. The product was launched on Q1/2016
The Intel Xeon E5-2687W v2 operates with 8 cores and 8 CPU threads. It run at 4.00 GHz base 3.60 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 150 W.The processor is attached to the LGA 2011 CPU socket. This version includes 25.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 4 memory channels to support DDR3-1866 RAM and features 3.0 PCIe Gen 40 lanes. Tjunction keeps below -- degrees C. In particular, Ivy Bridge EP Architecture is enhanced with 22 nm technology and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d. The product was launched on Q3/2013
Qualcomm Snapdragon 652
Intel Xeon E5-2687W v2
Compare Detail
| 1.80 GHz | Frequency | 3.40 GHz |
| 8 | Cores | 8 |
| 1.80 GHz | Turbo (1 Core) | 4.00 GHz |
| 1.40 GHz | Turbo (All Cores) | 3.60 GHz |
 No |
Hyperthreading | Yes  |
| No |
Overclocking | No |
| hybrid (big.LITTLE) | Core Architecture | normal |
| Qualcomm Adreno 510 | GPU | no iGPU |
| 0.60 GHz | GPU (Turbo) | No turbo |
| 28 nm | Technology | 22 nm |
| 0.60 GHz | GPU (Turbo) | No turbo |
| 11 | DirectX Version | |
| 0 | Max. displays | |
| LPDDR3-933 | Memory | DDR3-1866 |
| 2 | Memory channels | 4 |
| Max memory | ||
| No |
ECC | Yes |
| -- | L2 Cache | -- |
| -- | L3 Cache | 25.00 MB |
| PCIe version | 3.0 | |
| PCIe lanes | 40 | |
| 28 nm | Technology | 22 nm |
| N/A | Socket | LGA 2011 |
| TDP | 150 W | |
| None | Virtualization | VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d |
| Q1/2016 | Release date | Q3/2013 |
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Intel Xeon E5-2687W v2
160 (47%)
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Intel Xeon E5-2687W v2
1,135 (11%)
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Qualcomm Snapdragon 652
259 (11%)
Intel Xeon E5-2687W v2
749 (33%)
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Qualcomm Snapdragon 652
977 (2%)
Intel Xeon E5-2687W v2
6,418 (13%)
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
Qualcomm Snapdragon 652
155 (1%)
AnTuTu 8 benchmark
The AnTuTu 8 Benchmark measures the performance of a SoC. AnTuTu benchmarks the CPU, GPU, Memory as well as the UX (User Experience) by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu can benchmark any ARM CPU that runs under Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly compareable if the benchmark has been performed under different operating systems.
Qualcomm Snapdragon 652
97,642 (14%)
Blender 2.81 (bmw27)
Blender is a free 3D graphics software for rendering (creating) 3D bodies, which can also be textured and animated in the software. The Blender benchmark creates predefined scenes and measures the time (s) required for the entire scene. The shorter the time required, the better. We selected bmw27 as the benchmark scene.
Intel Xeon E5-2687W v2
297.13 (15%)
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Intel Xeon E5-2687W v2
3,493 (50%)
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Intel Xeon E5-2687W v2
21,992 (23%)
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Intel Xeon E5-2687W v2
1.86 (50%)
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Intel Xeon E5-2687W v2
12.25 (22%)
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-Comparison. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-Comparison’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
Intel Xeon E5-2687W v2
16,346 (15%)
Electric Usage Estimate
Electric Usage Estimate
Popular Comparision
Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 652
Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 vs
Samsung Exynos 9611
Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen. 2 vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 652
HiSilicon Kirin 980 vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 652
Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 652
Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 vs
Intel Core i3-2100T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 vs
Intel Core i3-2330E
Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 vs
Samsung Exynos 9810
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 652
AMD Ryzen Embedded V1500B vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 652
Intel Core i5-10300H vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 652
Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 vs
Intel Xeon E3-1220 v6
Intel Core i5-4210U vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 652
Intel Xeon E5-2667 v2 vs
Intel Xeon E5-2687W v2
Intel Xeon E5-2687W v2 vs
Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2
Intel Xeon E5-2687W v2 vs
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2
Intel Core i7-4930K vs
Intel Xeon E5-2687W v2
Intel Xeon E5-2687W v2 vs
Intel Core i7-6700K
Intel Xeon E5-2687W v2 vs
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3 vs
Intel Xeon E5-2687W v2
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 vs
Intel Xeon E5-2687W v2
Intel Core i7-4770K vs
Intel Xeon E5-2687W v2
Intel Xeon E5-2687W v2 vs
Intel Core i7-4800MQ
AMD A6-5400B vs
Intel Xeon E5-2687W v2
Intel Xeon E5-2687W v2 vs
Intel Core i7-5850HQ
Intel Xeon E5-2687W v2 vs
AMD Phenom II X4 830
Intel Atom S1240 vs
Intel Xeon E5-2687W v2
Intel Xeon E5-2687W v2 vs
Intel Core i7-4960X
Comments
