| Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 | HiSilicon Kirin 925 | |
| Max TDP | ||
| NA | Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA |
| NA | Running cost per day | NA |
| NA | Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA |
| NA | Running cost per year | NA |
Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 vs HiSilicon Kirin 925
The Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 operates with 47 cores and 4 CPU threads. It run at -- base all cores while the TDP is set at .The processor is attached to the N/A CPU socket. This version includes -- of L3 cache on one chip, supports 1 memory channels to support LPDDR2LPDDR3 RAM and features PCIe Gen lanes. Tjunction keeps below -- degrees C. In particular, Cortex-A7 Architecture is enhanced with 28 nm technology and supports None. The product was launched on 2015
The HiSilicon Kirin 925 operates with 8 cores and 4 CPU threads. It run at 1.80 GHz base 1.30 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at .The processor is attached to the N/A CPU socket. This version includes -- of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support LPDDR3-1600 RAM and features PCIe Gen lanes. Tjunction keeps below -- degrees C. In particular, Cortex-A15 / Cortex-A7 Architecture is enhanced with 28 nm technology and supports None. The product was launched on Q3/2014
Qualcomm Snapdragon 212
HiSilicon Kirin 925
Compare Detail
| 1.30 GHz | Frequency | 1.80 GHz |
| 47 | Cores | 8 |
| -- | Turbo (1 Core) | 1.80 GHz |
| Turbo (All Cores) | 1.30 GHz | |
 No |
Hyperthreading | No |
| No |
Overclocking | No |
| normal | Core Architecture | hybrid (big.LITTLE) |
| Qualcomm Adreno 304 | GPU | ARM Mali-T628 MP4 |
| 0.40 GHz | GPU (Turbo) | 0.60 GHz |
| 28 nm | Technology | 28 nm |
| 0.40 GHz | GPU (Turbo) | 0.60 GHz |
| 11 | DirectX Version | 11 |
| 0 | Max. displays | 1 |
| LPDDR2LPDDR3 | Memory | LPDDR3-1600 |
| 1 | Memory channels | 2 |
| Max memory | ||
| No |
ECC | No |
| -- | L2 Cache | -- |
| -- | L3 Cache | -- |
| PCIe version | ||
| PCIe lanes | ||
| 28 nm | Technology | 28 nm |
| N/A | Socket | N/A |
| TDP | ||
| None | Virtualization | None |
| 2015 | Release date | Q3/2014 |
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
Qualcomm Snapdragon 212
20 (0%)
HiSilicon Kirin 925
78 (0%)
Electric Usage Estimate
Electric Usage Estimate
Popular Comparision
Apple M1 vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 212
HiSilicon Kirin 910 vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 212
Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 vs
HiSilicon Kirin 925
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 Lite vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 212
Intel Core i7-1185G7 vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 212
Intel Atom x6425RE vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 212
Intel Pentium G860T vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 212
Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 vs
Intel Xeon Gold 5318H
Intel Celeron N4020 vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 212
Intel Atom x5-Z8350 vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 212
Intel Core i3-2367M vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 212
Intel Xeon E-2276M vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 212
Intel Core2 Duo E6700 vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 212
Intel Xeon E3-1231 v3 vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 212
Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 vs
Intel Core i5-4308U
Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 vs
HiSilicon Kirin 925
Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 vs
HiSilicon Kirin 925
HiSilicon Kirin 925 vs
AMD FX-8310
Apple A14 Bionic vs
HiSilicon Kirin 925
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 vs
HiSilicon Kirin 925
HiSilicon Kirin 925 vs
AMD FX-4300
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 vs
HiSilicon Kirin 925
HiSilicon Kirin 925 vs
Intel Core i3-3220
HiSilicon Kirin 925 vs
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
HiSilicon Kirin 925 vs
Intel Core i5-9400H
HiSilicon Kirin 925 vs
Intel Core i7-4770K
Intel Core i5-4570 vs
HiSilicon Kirin 925
HiSilicon Kirin 925 vs
Intel Core M-5Y70
HiSilicon Kirin 925 vs
Intel Xeon Gold 6142M
HiSilicon Kirin 925 vs
Intel Core i7-5960X
Comments
