| HiSilicon Kirin 910 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 | |
| Max TDP | ||
| NA | Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA |
| NA | Running cost per day | NA |
| NA | Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA |
| NA | Running cost per year | NA |
HiSilicon Kirin 910 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 212
The HiSilicon Kirin 910 operates with 49 cores and 4 CPU threads. It run at -- base all cores while the TDP is set at .The processor is attached to the N/A CPU socket. This version includes -- of L3 cache on one chip, supports 1 memory channels to support LPDDR3 RAM and features PCIe Gen lanes. Tjunction keeps below -- degrees C. In particular, Cortex-A9 Architecture is enhanced with 28 nm technology and supports None. The product was launched on Q1/2014
The Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 operates with 47 cores and 4 CPU threads. It run at -- base all cores while the TDP is set at .The processor is attached to the N/A CPU socket. This version includes -- of L3 cache on one chip, supports 1 memory channels to support LPDDR2LPDDR3 RAM and features PCIe Gen lanes. Tjunction keeps below -- degrees C. In particular, Cortex-A7 Architecture is enhanced with 28 nm technology and supports None. The product was launched on 2015
HiSilicon Kirin 910
Qualcomm Snapdragon 212
Compare Detail
| 1.60 GHz | Frequency | 1.30 GHz |
| 49 | Cores | 47 |
| -- | Turbo (1 Core) | -- |
| Turbo (All Cores) | ||
 No |
Hyperthreading | No |
| No |
Overclocking | No |
| normal | Core Architecture | normal |
| ARM Mali-450 MP4 | GPU | Qualcomm Adreno 304 |
| 0.53 GHz | GPU (Turbo) | 0.40 GHz |
| 28 nm | Technology | 28 nm |
| 0.53 GHz | GPU (Turbo) | 0.40 GHz |
| 0 | DirectX Version | 11 |
| 1 | Max. displays | 0 |
| LPDDR3 | Memory | LPDDR2LPDDR3 |
| 1 | Memory channels | 1 |
| Max memory | ||
| No |
ECC | No |
| -- | L2 Cache | -- |
| -- | L3 Cache | -- |
| PCIe version | ||
| PCIe lanes | ||
| 28 nm | Technology | 28 nm |
| N/A | Socket | N/A |
| TDP | ||
| None | Virtualization | None |
| Q1/2014 | Release date | 2015 |
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
HiSilicon Kirin 910
33 (0%)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 212
20 (0%)
Electric Usage Estimate
Electric Usage Estimate
Popular Comparision
HiSilicon Kirin 910 vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 212
HiSilicon Kirin 910 vs
Raspberry Pi 4 B (Broadcom BCM2711)
HiSilicon Kirin 910 vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435
Apple M1 vs
HiSilicon Kirin 910
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U vs
HiSilicon Kirin 910
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 vs
HiSilicon Kirin 910
HiSilicon Kirin 910 vs
Intel Core i7-10870H
HiSilicon Kirin 910 vs
Intel Core i9-9980XE
AMD Ryzen 3 5400U vs
HiSilicon Kirin 910
HiSilicon Kirin 910 vs
Intel Core i5-3450S
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X vs
HiSilicon Kirin 910
HiSilicon Kirin 910 vs
Intel Core i5-3337U
HiSilicon Kirin 910 vs
Intel Xeon W-2133
HiSilicon Kirin 910 vs
Intel Core i7-2960XM
HiSilicon Kirin 910 vs
AMD A4-6300
Apple M1 vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 212
HiSilicon Kirin 910 vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 212
Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 vs
HiSilicon Kirin 925
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 Lite vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 212
Intel Core i7-1185G7 vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 212
Intel Atom x6425RE vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 212
Intel Pentium G860T vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 212
Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 vs
Intel Xeon Gold 5318H
Intel Celeron N4020 vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 212
Intel Atom x5-Z8350 vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 212
Intel Core i3-2367M vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 212
Intel Xeon E-2276M vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 212
Intel Core2 Duo E6700 vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 212
Intel Xeon E3-1231 v3 vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 212
Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 vs
Intel Core i5-4308U
Comments
