| HiSilicon Kirin 9000E | Intel Xeon E5-2667 v4 | |
| Max TDP | 135 W | |
| NA | Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA |
| NA | Running cost per day | NA |
| NA | Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA |
| NA | Running cost per year | NA |
HiSilicon Kirin 9000E vs Intel Xeon E5-2667 v4
The HiSilicon Kirin 9000E operates with 8 cores and 8 CPU threads. It run at 3.13 GHz base 2.05 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at .The processor is attached to the N/A CPU socket. This version includes -- of L3 cache on one chip, supports 4 memory channels to support LPDDR4X-2133LPDDR5-2750 RAM and features PCIe Gen lanes. Tjunction keeps below -- degrees C. In particular, Cortex-A77 / Cortex-A55 Architecture is enhanced with 5 nm technology and supports None. The product was launched on Q4/2020
The Intel Xeon E5-2667 v4 operates with 8 cores and 8 CPU threads. It run at 3.60 GHz base 3.40 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 135 W.The processor is attached to the LGA 2011-3 CPU socket. This version includes 25.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 4 memory channels to support DDR4-2400 RAM and features 3.0 PCIe Gen 40 lanes. Tjunction keeps below -- degrees C. In particular, Broadwell E Architecture is enhanced with 14 nm technology and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d. The product was launched on Q1/2016
HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
Intel Xeon E5-2667 v4
Compare Detail
| 3.13 GHz | Frequency | 3.20 GHz |
| 8 | Cores | 8 |
| 3.13 GHz | Turbo (1 Core) | 3.60 GHz |
| 2.05 GHz | Turbo (All Cores) | 3.40 GHz |
 No |
Hyperthreading | Yes  |
| No |
Overclocking | No |
| hybrid (Prime / big.LITTLE) | Core Architecture | normal |
| ARM Mali-G78 MP22 | GPU | no iGPU |
| No turbo | GPU (Turbo) | No turbo |
| 5 nm | Technology | 14 nm |
| No turbo | GPU (Turbo) | No turbo |
| 12 | DirectX Version | |
| 1 | Max. displays | |
| LPDDR4X-2133LPDDR5-2750 | Memory | DDR4-2400 |
| 4 | Memory channels | 4 |
| Max memory | ||
| No |
ECC | Yes |
| -- | L2 Cache | -- |
| -- | L3 Cache | 25.00 MB |
| PCIe version | 3.0 | |
| PCIe lanes | 40 | |
| 5 nm | Technology | 14 nm |
| N/A | Socket | LGA 2011-3 |
| TDP | 135 W | |
| None | Virtualization | VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d |
| Q4/2020 | Release date | Q1/2016 |
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Intel Xeon E5-2667 v4
157 (46%)
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Intel Xeon E5-2667 v4
1,451 (14%)
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
1,069 (47%)
Intel Xeon E5-2667 v4
978 (43%)
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
3,768 (8%)
Intel Xeon E5-2667 v4
11,661 (23%)
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
2,140 (10%)
AnTuTu 8 benchmark
The AnTuTu 8 Benchmark measures the performance of a SoC. AnTuTu benchmarks the CPU, GPU, Memory as well as the UX (User Experience) by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu can benchmark any ARM CPU that runs under Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly compareable if the benchmark has been performed under different operating systems.
HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
632,778 (88%)
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Intel Xeon E5-2667 v4
4,265 (61%)
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Intel Xeon E5-2667 v4
36,304 (38%)
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Intel Xeon E5-2667 v4
1.91 (52%)
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Intel Xeon E5-2667 v4
17.88 (32%)
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-Comparison. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-Comparison’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
Intel Xeon E5-2667 v4
16,634 (15%)
Electric Usage Estimate
Electric Usage Estimate
Popular Comparision
HiSilicon Kirin 9000E vs
Apple M1
HiSilicon Kirin 9000 vs
HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 vs
HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
HiSilicon Kirin 9000E vs
Apple A14 Bionic
HiSilicon Kirin 9000E vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
HiSilicon Kirin 990 4G vs
HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
HiSilicon Kirin 9000E vs
HiSilicon Kirin 960
AMD A10-4657M vs
HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
Intel Core i9-9900K vs
HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
HiSilicon Kirin 9000E vs
Intel Xeon E5-2667 v4
Raspberry Pi 3 B+ (Broadcom BCM2837B0) vs
HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
HiSilicon Kirin 9000E vs
Intel Pentium 2030M
HiSilicon Kirin 9000E vs
Intel Core i5-10300H
HiSilicon Kirin 9000E vs
Intel Core i7-8850H
HiSilicon Kirin 9000E vs
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
Intel Xeon E5-2667 v4 vs
Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3
Intel Xeon E5-2667 v4 vs
Intel Xeon E5-2687W v4
Intel Xeon E5-2667 v2 vs
Intel Xeon E5-2667 v4
Intel Xeon E5-2699 v4 vs
Intel Xeon E5-2667 v4
Intel Xeon E5-2667 v4 vs
Intel Xeon E5-1680 v3
Intel Xeon E5-2667 v4 vs
Intel Xeon E5-2697 v4
Intel Xeon E5-2667 v4 vs
Intel Core i7-6700K
Intel Xeon E5-2667 v4 vs
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v4
Intel Xeon E5-2667 v4 vs
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X
Intel Xeon E5-2667 v4 vs
Intel Xeon E5-2660 v3
Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3 vs
Intel Xeon E5-2667 v4
Intel Xeon E5-1630 v3 vs
Intel Xeon E5-2667 v4
Intel Xeon E5-2667 v4 vs
AMD A10-7700K
Intel Core i5-4670K vs
Intel Xeon E5-2667 v4
Intel Xeon E5-2643 v4 vs
Intel Xeon E5-2667 v4
Comments
