| MediaTek MT6572M | Samsung Exynos 980 | |
| Max TDP | ||
| NA | Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA |
| NA | Running cost per day | NA |
| NA | Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA |
| NA | Running cost per year | NA |
MediaTek MT6572M vs Samsung Exynos 980
The MediaTek MT6572M operates with 27 cores and 2 CPU threads. It run at -- base all cores while the TDP is set at .The processor is attached to the N/A CPU socket. This version includes -- of L3 cache on one chip, supports 0 memory channels to support LPDDR2 RAM and features PCIe Gen lanes. Tjunction keeps below -- degrees C. In particular, Cortex-A9 Architecture is enhanced with 28 nm technology and supports None. The product was launched on 2013
The Samsung Exynos 980 operates with 8 cores and 2 CPU threads. It run at 2.20 GHz base 1.80 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at .The processor is attached to the N/A CPU socket. This version includes -- of L3 cache on one chip, supports 4 memory channels to support LPDDR4X-1866 RAM and features PCIe Gen lanes. Tjunction keeps below -- degrees C. In particular, Cortex-A77 / Cortex-A55 Architecture is enhanced with 8 nm technology and supports None. The product was launched on Q4/2019
MediaTek MT6572M
Samsung Exynos 980
Compare Detail
| 1.00 GHz | Frequency | 2.20 GHz |
| 27 | Cores | 8 |
| -- | Turbo (1 Core) | 2.20 GHz |
| Turbo (All Cores) | 1.80 GHz | |
 No |
Hyperthreading | No |
| No |
Overclocking | No |
| normal | Core Architecture | hybrid (big.LITTLE) |
| ARM Mali-400 | GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP5 |
| 0.40 GHz | GPU (Turbo) | 0.72 GHz |
| 28 nm | Technology | 8 nm |
| 0.40 GHz | GPU (Turbo) | 0.72 GHz |
| DirectX Version | 12 | |
| 1 | Max. displays | 2 |
| LPDDR2 | Memory | LPDDR4X-1866 |
| 0 | Memory channels | 4 |
| Max memory | ||
| No |
ECC | No |
| -- | L2 Cache | 2.00 MB |
| -- | L3 Cache | -- |
| PCIe version | ||
| PCIe lanes | ||
| 28 nm | Technology | 8 nm |
| N/A | Socket | N/A |
| TDP | ||
| None | Virtualization | None |
| 2013 | Release date | Q4/2019 |
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
MediaTek MT6572M
5 (0%)
Samsung Exynos 980
261 (1%)
AnTuTu 8 benchmark
The AnTuTu 8 Benchmark measures the performance of a SoC. AnTuTu benchmarks the CPU, GPU, Memory as well as the UX (User Experience) by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu can benchmark any ARM CPU that runs under Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly compareable if the benchmark has been performed under different operating systems.
MediaTek MT6572M
(0%)
Samsung Exynos 980
330,671 (46%)
Electric Usage Estimate
Electric Usage Estimate
Popular Comparision
MediaTek Helio P65 vs
MediaTek MT6572M
MediaTek Helio X30 vs
MediaTek MT6572M
Intel Pentium E5400 vs
MediaTek MT6572M
MediaTek MT6572M vs
Intel Core i5-1145G7E
MediaTek MT6572M vs
Intel Xeon D-1602
MediaTek MT6572M vs
Intel Core i7-10700
MediaTek MT6572M vs
Intel Core i5-1035G7
MediaTek MT6572M vs
Samsung Exynos 980
Intel Core i3-1000NG4 vs
MediaTek MT6572M
AMD A4-1200 vs
MediaTek MT6572M
MediaTek Helio G90 vs
MediaTek MT6572M
MediaTek MT6572M vs
AMD Ryzen 5 5600U
AMD Ryzen 5 2600H vs
MediaTek MT6572M
Samsung Exynos 4415 vs
MediaTek MT6572M
MediaTek MT6572M vs
Intel Core i5-11500H
Samsung Exynos 980 vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G vs
Samsung Exynos 980
Samsung Exynos 980 vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
Samsung Exynos 980 vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
Samsung Exynos 980 vs
Samsung Exynos 9611
Samsung Exynos 980 vs
Apple A11 Bionic
Samsung Exynos 980 vs
Samsung Exynos 7570
Intel Core i5-2520M vs
Samsung Exynos 980
Intel Core i5-10600K vs
Samsung Exynos 980
Samsung Exynos 980 vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus
Intel Core i3-6167U vs
Samsung Exynos 980
Samsung Exynos 980 vs
Intel Core2 Duo E6700
Intel Celeron G5950 vs
Samsung Exynos 980
Samsung Exynos 980 vs
Intel Core i9-10900KF
AMD Ryzen 3 4300U vs
Samsung Exynos 980
Comments
