Samsung Exynos 980 | Intel Core2 Duo E6700 | |
Max TDP | 65 W | |
NA | Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA |
NA | Running cost per day | NA |
NA | Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA |
NA | Running cost per year | NA |
Samsung Exynos 980 vs Intel Core2 Duo E6700
The Samsung Exynos 980 operates with 8 cores and 8 CPU threads. It run at 2.20 GHz base 1.80 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at .The processor is attached to the N/A CPU socket. This version includes -- of L3 cache on one chip, supports 4 memory channels to support LPDDR4X-1866 RAM and features PCIe Gen lanes. Tjunction keeps below -- degrees C. In particular, Cortex-A77 / Cortex-A55 Architecture is enhanced with 8 nm technology and supports None. The product was launched on Q4/2019
The Intel Core2 Duo E6700 operates with 2 cores and 8 CPU threads. It run at -- base -- all cores while the TDP is set at 65 W.The processor is attached to the LGA 775 CPU socket. This version includes -- of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support DDR2-1066DDR3-1333 RAM and features PCIe Gen lanes. Tjunction keeps below -- degrees C. In particular, Conroe (Core) Architecture is enhanced with 65 nm technology and supports VT-x. The product was launched on Q3/2006
Samsung Exynos 980
Intel Core2 Duo E6700
Compare Detail
2.20 GHz | Frequency | 2.66 GHz |
8 | Cores | 2 |
2.20 GHz | Turbo (1 Core) | -- |
1.80 GHz | Turbo (All Cores) | -- |
No | Hyperthreading | No |
No | Overclocking | Yes |
hybrid (big.LITTLE) | Core Architecture | normal |
ARM Mali-G76 MP5 | GPU | no iGPU |
0.72 GHz | GPU (Turbo) | No turbo |
8 nm | Technology | 65 nm |
0.72 GHz | GPU (Turbo) | No turbo |
12 | DirectX Version | |
2 | Max. displays | |
LPDDR4X-1866 | Memory | DDR2-1066DDR3-1333 |
4 | Memory channels | 2 |
Max memory | ||
No | ECC | No |
2.00 MB | L2 Cache | 4.00 MB |
-- | L3 Cache | -- |
PCIe version | ||
PCIe lanes | ||
8 nm | Technology | 65 nm |
N/A | Socket | LGA 775 |
TDP | 65 W | |
None | Virtualization | VT-x |
Q4/2019 | Release date | Q3/2006 |
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
AnTuTu 8 benchmark
The AnTuTu 8 Benchmark measures the performance of a SoC. AnTuTu benchmarks the CPU, GPU, Memory as well as the UX (User Experience) by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu can benchmark any ARM CPU that runs under Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly compareable if the benchmark has been performed under different operating systems.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-Comparison. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-Comparison’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.