| HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G | Intel Core i9-7920X | |
| Max TDP | 165 W | |
| NA | Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA |
| NA | Running cost per day | NA |
| NA | Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA |
| NA | Running cost per year | NA |
HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G vs Intel Core i9-7920X
The HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G operates with 8 cores and 8 CPU threads. It run at 2.58 GHz base 1.84 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at .The processor is attached to the N/A CPU socket. This version includes -- of L3 cache on one chip, supports 4 memory channels to support LPDDR4X-2133 RAM and features PCIe Gen lanes. Tjunction keeps below -- degrees C. In particular, Cortex-A76 / Cortex-A55 Architecture is enhanced with 7 nm technology and supports None. The product was launched on Q2/2020
The Intel Core i9-7920X operates with 12 cores and 8 CPU threads. It run at 4.30 GHz base 3.70 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 165 W.The processor is attached to the LGA 2066 CPU socket. This version includes 16.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 4 memory channels to support DDR4-2666 RAM and features 3.0 PCIe Gen 44 lanes. Tjunction keeps below -- degrees C. In particular, Skylake X Architecture is enhanced with 14 nm technology and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d. The product was launched on Q3/2017
HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G
Intel Core i9-7920X
Compare Detail
| 2.58 GHz | Frequency | 2.90 GHz |
| 8 | Cores | 12 |
| 2.58 GHz | Turbo (1 Core) | 4.30 GHz |
| 1.84 GHz | Turbo (All Cores) | 3.70 GHz |
 No |
Hyperthreading | Yes  |
| No |
Overclocking | Yes |
| hybrid (Prime / big.LITTLE) | Core Architecture | normal |
| ARM Mali-G77 MP8 | GPU | no iGPU |
| No turbo | GPU (Turbo) | No turbo |
| 7 nm | Technology | 14 nm |
| No turbo | GPU (Turbo) | No turbo |
| 12 | DirectX Version | |
| 1 | Max. displays | |
| LPDDR4X-2133 | Memory | DDR4-2666 |
| 4 | Memory channels | 4 |
| Max memory | ||
| No |
ECC | No |
| -- | L2 Cache | -- |
| -- | L3 Cache | 16.00 MB |
| PCIe version | 3.0 | |
| PCIe lanes | 44 | |
| 7 nm | Technology | 14 nm |
| N/A | Socket | LGA 2066 |
| TDP | 165 W | |
| None | Virtualization | VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d |
| Q2/2020 | Release date | Q3/2017 |
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Intel Core i9-7920X
195 (57%)
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Intel Core i9-7920X
2,442 (23%)
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G
689 (31%)
Intel Core i9-7920X
1,133 (50%)
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G
2,518 (5%)
Intel Core i9-7920X
11,502 (23%)
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G
820 (4%)
Intel Core i9-7920X
(0%)
AnTuTu 8 benchmark
The AnTuTu 8 Benchmark measures the performance of a SoC. AnTuTu benchmarks the CPU, GPU, Memory as well as the UX (User Experience) by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu can benchmark any ARM CPU that runs under Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly compareable if the benchmark has been performed under different operating systems.
HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G
406,837 (57%)
Intel Core i9-7920X
(0%)
Blender 2.81 (bmw27)
Blender is a free 3D graphics software for rendering (creating) 3D bodies, which can also be textured and animated in the software. The Blender benchmark creates predefined scenes and measures the time (s) required for the entire scene. The shorter the time required, the better. We selected bmw27 as the benchmark scene.
Intel Core i9-7920X
120.91 (6%)
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Intel Core i9-7920X
4,885 (70%)
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Intel Core i9-7920X
45,778 (48%)
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Intel Core i9-7920X
2.27 (61%)
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Intel Core i9-7920X
26.79 (48%)
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-Comparison. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-Comparison’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
Intel Core i9-7920X
23,294 (22%)
Electric Usage Estimate
Electric Usage Estimate
Popular Comparision
HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G vs
HiSilicon Kirin 980
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 vs
HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus
HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G vs
HiSilicon Kirin 9000
HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G vs
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G vs
HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G vs
Apple A14 Bionic
Samsung Exynos 9825 vs
HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 vs
HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 610
HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
HiSilicon Kirin 810 vs
HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G
HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G vs
Intel Core i9-7920X
HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G vs
Intel Xeon Gold 5220
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X vs
Intel Core i9-7920X
Intel Core i9-7920X vs
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Intel Core i9-7900X vs
Intel Core i9-7920X
Intel Core i7-8700K vs
Intel Core i9-7920X
Intel Core i9-7920X vs
Intel Xeon Silver 4116
Intel Core i9-7920X vs
Intel Core i7-7700K
Intel Core i9-7920X vs
Intel Core i7-7820X
Intel Core i9-7920X vs
Intel Core i9-7940X
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X vs
Intel Core i9-7920X
Intel Core i9-7920X vs
Intel Core i7-7700
Intel Core i9-10920X vs
Intel Core i9-7920X
Intel Core i7-5820K vs
Intel Core i9-7920X
Intel Core i9-9900K vs
Intel Core i9-7920X
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4 vs
Intel Core i9-7920X
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 vs
Intel Core i9-7920X
Comments
