| HiSilicon Kirin 9000E | Intel Celeron E3200 | |
| Max TDP | 65 W | |
| NA | Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA |
| NA | Running cost per day | NA |
| NA | Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA |
| NA | Running cost per year | NA |
HiSilicon Kirin 9000E vs Intel Celeron E3200
The HiSilicon Kirin 9000E operates with 8 cores and 8 CPU threads. It run at 3.13 GHz base 2.05 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at .The processor is attached to the N/A CPU socket. This version includes -- of L3 cache on one chip, supports 4 memory channels to support LPDDR4X-2133LPDDR5-2750 RAM and features PCIe Gen lanes. Tjunction keeps below -- degrees C. In particular, Cortex-A77 / Cortex-A55 Architecture is enhanced with 5 nm technology and supports None. The product was launched on Q4/2020
The Intel Celeron E3200 operates with 2 cores and 8 CPU threads. It run at -- base -- all cores while the TDP is set at 65 W.The processor is attached to the LGA 775 CPU socket. This version includes -- of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support DDR2-800DDR3-1066 RAM and features PCIe Gen lanes. Tjunction keeps below -- degrees C. In particular, Wolfdale (Penryn) Architecture is enhanced with 45 nm technology and supports VT-x. The product was launched on Q3/2009
HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
Intel Celeron E3200
Compare Detail
| 3.13 GHz | Frequency | 2.40 GHz |
| 8 | Cores | 2 |
| 3.13 GHz | Turbo (1 Core) | -- |
| 2.05 GHz | Turbo (All Cores) | -- |
 No |
Hyperthreading | No |
| No |
Overclocking | Yes  |
| hybrid (Prime / big.LITTLE) | Core Architecture | normal |
| ARM Mali-G78 MP22 | GPU | no iGPU |
| No turbo | GPU (Turbo) | No turbo |
| 5 nm | Technology | 45 nm |
| No turbo | GPU (Turbo) | No turbo |
| 12 | DirectX Version | |
| 1 | Max. displays | |
| LPDDR4X-2133LPDDR5-2750 | Memory | DDR2-800DDR3-1066 |
| 4 | Memory channels | 2 |
| Max memory | ||
| No |
ECC | No |
| -- | L2 Cache | 1.00 MB |
| -- | L3 Cache | -- |
| PCIe version | ||
| PCIe lanes | ||
| 5 nm | Technology | 45 nm |
| N/A | Socket | LGA 775 |
| TDP | 65 W | |
| None | Virtualization | VT-x |
| Q4/2020 | Release date | Q3/2009 |
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
1,069 (47%)
Intel Celeron E3200
333 (15%)
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
3,768 (8%)
Intel Celeron E3200
583 (1%)
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
2,140 (10%)
Intel Celeron E3200
(0%)
AnTuTu 8 benchmark
The AnTuTu 8 Benchmark measures the performance of a SoC. AnTuTu benchmarks the CPU, GPU, Memory as well as the UX (User Experience) by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu can benchmark any ARM CPU that runs under Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly compareable if the benchmark has been performed under different operating systems.
HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
632,778 (88%)
Intel Celeron E3200
(0%)
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-Comparison. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-Comparison’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
Intel Celeron E3200
812 (1%)
Electric Usage Estimate
Electric Usage Estimate
Popular Comparision
HiSilicon Kirin 9000E vs
Apple M1
HiSilicon Kirin 9000 vs
HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 vs
HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
HiSilicon Kirin 9000E vs
Apple A14 Bionic
HiSilicon Kirin 9000E vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
HiSilicon Kirin 990 4G vs
HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
HiSilicon Kirin 9000E vs
HiSilicon Kirin 960
AMD A10-4657M vs
HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
Intel Core i9-9900K vs
HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
HiSilicon Kirin 9000E vs
Intel Xeon E5-2667 v4
Raspberry Pi 3 B+ (Broadcom BCM2837B0) vs
HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
HiSilicon Kirin 9000E vs
Intel Pentium 2030M
HiSilicon Kirin 9000E vs
Intel Core i5-10300H
HiSilicon Kirin 9000E vs
Intel Core i7-8850H
HiSilicon Kirin 9000E vs
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
MediaTek MT6750T vs
Intel Celeron E3200
AMD Ryzen 3 4300U vs
Intel Celeron E3200
Intel Celeron N3060 vs
Intel Celeron E3200
Intel Core i9-10850K vs
Intel Celeron E3200
Intel Celeron E3200 vs
Intel Core i7-11800H
Intel Core i5-8400 vs
Intel Celeron E3200
HiSilicon Kirin 9000E vs
Intel Celeron E3200
Intel Celeron J4115 vs
Intel Celeron E3200
AMD FX-8120 vs
Intel Celeron E3200
Intel Celeron E3200 vs
AMD Athlon 5150
Intel Celeron E3200 vs
Intel Core i7-9700KF
Intel Celeron N4505 vs
Intel Celeron E3200
Intel Celeron G530 vs
Intel Celeron E3200
Intel Celeron E3200 vs
Intel Xeon D-1713NT
Intel Core i7-4510U vs
Intel Celeron E3200
Comments
