| AMD E1-1200 | Samsung Exynos 7578 | |
| 18 W | Max TDP | |
| NA | Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA |
| NA | Running cost per day | NA |
| NA | Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA |
| NA | Running cost per year | NA |
AMD E1-1200 vs Samsung Exynos 7578
The AMD E1-1200 operates with 2 cores and 2 CPU threads. It run at -- base -- all cores while the TDP is set at 18 W.The processor is attached to the BGA 413 CPU socket. This version includes 1.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 1 memory channels to support DDR3-1066 RAM and features PCIe Gen lanes. Tjunction keeps below -- degrees C. In particular, Zacate (Bobcat) Architecture is enhanced with 32 nm technology and supports AMD-V. The product was launched on Q3/2012
The Samsung Exynos 7578 operates with 453 cores and 2 CPU threads. It run at -- base all cores while the TDP is set at .The processor is attached to the N/A CPU socket. This version includes -- of L3 cache on one chip, supports 0 memory channels to support LPDDR3-1066 RAM and features PCIe Gen lanes. Tjunction keeps below -- degrees C. In particular, Cortex-A53 Architecture is enhanced with 28 nm technology and supports None. The product was launched on Q2/2015
Samsung Exynos 7578
Compare Detail
| 1.40 GHz | Frequency | 1.50 GHz |
| 2 | Cores | 453 |
| -- | Turbo (1 Core) | -- |
| -- | Turbo (All Cores) | |
 No |
Hyperthreading | No |
| No |
Overclocking | No |
| normal | Core Architecture | normal |
| AMD Radeon HD 7310 | GPU | ARM Mali-T720 MP2 |
| No turbo | GPU (Turbo) | 0.65 GHz |
| 32 nm | Technology | 28 nm |
| No turbo | GPU (Turbo) | 0.65 GHz |
| 11 | DirectX Version | 11 |
| 2 | Max. displays | 2 |
| DDR3-1066 | Memory | LPDDR3-1066 |
| 1 | Memory channels | 0 |
| Max memory | ||
| No |
ECC | No |
| -- | L2 Cache | -- |
| 1.00 MB | L3 Cache | -- |
| PCIe version | ||
| PCIe lanes | ||
| 32 nm | Technology | 28 nm |
| BGA 413 | Socket | N/A |
| 18 W | TDP | |
| AMD-V | Virtualization | None |
| Q3/2012 | Release date | Q2/2015 |
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
AMD E1-1200
125 (6%)
Samsung Exynos 7578
(0%)
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
AMD E1-1200
228 (0%)
Samsung Exynos 7578
(0%)
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
AMD E1-1200
86 (0%)
Samsung Exynos 7578
23 (0%)
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
AMD E1-1200
524 (8%)
Samsung Exynos 7578
(0%)
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
AMD E1-1200
740 (1%)
Samsung Exynos 7578
(0%)
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
AMD E1-1200
0.28 (8%)
Samsung Exynos 7578
(0%)
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
AMD E1-1200
0.54 (1%)
Samsung Exynos 7578
(0%)
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-Comparison. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-Comparison’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
AMD E1-1200
709 (1%)
Samsung Exynos 7578
(0%)
Electric Usage Estimate
Electric Usage Estimate
Popular Comparision
AMD E-350 vs
AMD E1-1200
Intel Celeron N2840 vs
AMD E1-1200
AMD E2-6110 vs
AMD E1-1200
AMD E1-1200 vs
AMD A4-6210
Intel Celeron N2807 vs
AMD E1-1200
AMD E1-1200 vs
AMD E1-6010
Intel Celeron J1900 vs
AMD E1-1200
AMD E1-1200 vs
Intel Atom S1260
AMD E1-1200 vs
Intel Celeron N2830
Intel Core i3-4030U vs
AMD E1-1200
Intel Pentium N3520 vs
AMD E1-1200
AMD E1-1200 vs
AMD Phenom II X4 B95
AMD E1-1200 vs
Intel Celeron N3050
Intel Core i3-3210 vs
AMD E1-1200
Intel Core i5-2500k vs
AMD E1-1200
Apple M1 vs
Samsung Exynos 7578
Samsung Exynos 4412 vs
Samsung Exynos 7578
Samsung Exynos 7578 vs
Samsung Exynos 7420
Samsung Exynos 7578 vs
Intel Pentium Gold G6420
Samsung Exynos 7578 vs
Intel Core i5-7400
AMD E1-1200 vs
Samsung Exynos 7578
Samsung Exynos 7578 vs
Intel Core i7-4960X
Samsung Exynos 3475 vs
Samsung Exynos 7578
AMD Phenom II X4 905e vs
Samsung Exynos 7578
Samsung Exynos 7578 vs
Intel Xeon Gold 6244
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4200G vs
Samsung Exynos 7578
Samsung Exynos 7578 vs
Intel Pentium Gold 4410Y
Samsung Exynos 7578 vs
Intel Core i5-4430
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U vs
Samsung Exynos 7578
AMD Epyc 7401 vs
Samsung Exynos 7578
Comments
