GET FREE $100 Welcome Offer
BUY AND SELL BTC, BNB, CAKE, DOGE, ETH AND 27 MORE
BUY AND SELL BTC,
BNB, CAKE, DOGE
ETH AND 27 MORE

Intel Xeon E7-8880 v2 vs AMD C-70

Intel Xeon E7-8880 v2

The Intel Xeon E7-8880 v2 operates with 15 cores and 30 CPU threads. It run at 3.10 GHz base 3.10 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 130 W.The processor is attached to the LGA 2011 CPU socket. This version includes 38.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 4 memory channels to support DDR3-1600 RAM and features PCIe Gen lanes. Tjunction keeps below -- degrees C. In particular, Ivy Bridge EX Architecture is enhanced with 22 nm technology and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d. The product was launched on Q1/2014

Intel Xeon E7-8880 v2

The AMD C-70 operates with 2 cores and 30 CPU threads. It run at 1.33 GHz base 1.33 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 9 W.The processor is attached to the BGA 413 CPU socket. This version includes 1.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 1 memory channels to support DDR3-1066 RAM and features PCIe Gen lanes. Tjunction keeps below -- degrees C. In particular, Ontario (Bobcat) Architecture is enhanced with 40 nm technology and supports AMD-V. The product was launched on Q3/2012


Compare Detail

2.50 GHz Frequency 1.00 GHz
15 Cores 2
3.10 GHz Turbo (1 Core) 1.33 GHz
3.10 GHz Turbo (All Cores) 1.33 GHz
check Yes Hyperthreading No
uncheck No Overclocking Yes check
normal Core Architecture normal
no iGPU GPU AMD Radeon HD 6290
No turbo GPU (Turbo) 0.40 GHz
22 nm Technology 40 nm
No turbo GPU (Turbo) 0.40 GHz
DirectX Version 11
Max. displays 2
DDR3-1600 Memory DDR3-1066
4 Memory channels 1
Max memory
check Yes ECC No uncheck
-- L2 Cache --
38.00 MB L3 Cache 1.00 MB
PCIe version
PCIe lanes
22 nm Technology 40 nm
LGA 2011 Socket BGA 413
130 W TDP 9 W
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d Virtualization AMD-V
Q1/2014 Release date Q3/2012

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.

0% Complete
AMD C-70 65 (0%)
0% Complete

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.

0% Complete
AMD C-70 423 (6%)
6% Complete

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

0% Complete
AMD C-70 769 (1%)
1% Complete

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.

0% Complete
AMD C-70 0.24 (6%)
6% Complete

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

0% Complete
AMD C-70 0.38 (1%)
1% Complete

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-Comparison. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-Comparison’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.

Intel Xeon E7-8880 v2 28,573 (26%)
26% Complete
AMD C-70 599 (1%)
1% Complete
Electric Usage Estimate

Electric Usage Estimate

Electric Usage Estimate

Electric Usage Estimate

Intel Xeon E7-8880 v2 AMD C-70
130 W Max TDP 9 W
NA Power consumption per day (kWh) NA
NA Running cost per day NA
NA Power consumption per year (kWh) NA
NA Running cost per year NA

Comments

back to top