GET FREE $100 Welcome Offer
BUY AND SELL BTC, BNB, CAKE, DOGE, ETH AND 27 MORE
BUY AND SELL BTC,
BNB, CAKE, DOGE
ETH AND 27 MORE

AMD C-70 vs Intel Atom D2700

AMD C-70

The AMD C-70 operates with 2 cores and 2 CPU threads. It run at 1.33 GHz base 1.33 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 9 W.The processor is attached to the BGA 413 CPU socket. This version includes 1.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 1 memory channels to support DDR3-1066 RAM and features PCIe Gen lanes. Tjunction keeps below -- degrees C. In particular, Ontario (Bobcat) Architecture is enhanced with 40 nm technology and supports AMD-V. The product was launched on Q3/2012

AMD C-70

The Intel Atom D2700 operates with 2 cores and 2 CPU threads. It run at -- base -- all cores while the TDP is set at 10 W.The processor is attached to the BGA 559 CPU socket. This version includes 1.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 1 memory channels to support DDR3-1066 RAM and features PCIe Gen lanes. Tjunction keeps below -- degrees C. In particular, Cedarview Architecture is enhanced with 32 nm technology and supports None. The product was launched on Q3/2011


Compare Detail

1.00 GHz Frequency 2.13 GHz
2 Cores 2
1.33 GHz Turbo (1 Core) --
1.33 GHz Turbo (All Cores) --
uncheck No Hyperthreading Yes check
check Yes Overclocking No uncheck
normal Core Architecture normal
AMD Radeon HD 6290 GPU Intel GMA 3650
0.40 GHz GPU (Turbo) No turbo
40 nm Technology 32 nm
0.40 GHz GPU (Turbo) No turbo
11 DirectX Version 10.1
2 Max. displays 2
DDR3-1066 Memory DDR3-1066
1 Memory channels 1
Max memory
uncheck No ECC No uncheck
-- L2 Cache --
1.00 MB L3 Cache 1.00 MB
PCIe version
PCIe lanes
40 nm Technology 32 nm
BGA 413 Socket BGA 559
9 W TDP 10 W
AMD-V Virtualization None
Q3/2012 Release date Q3/2011

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.

AMD C-70 65 (0%)
0% Complete
0% Complete

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.

AMD C-70 423 (6%)
6% Complete
Intel Atom D2700 541 (8%)
8% Complete

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

AMD C-70 769 (1%)
1% Complete
Intel Atom D2700 1,280 (1%)
1% Complete

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.

AMD C-70 0.24 (6%)
6% Complete
Intel Atom D2700 0.22 (6%)
6% Complete

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

AMD C-70 0.38 (1%)
1% Complete
Intel Atom D2700 0.71 (1%)
1% Complete

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-Comparison. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-Comparison’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.

AMD C-70 599 (1%)
1% Complete
Intel Atom D2700 832 (1%)
1% Complete
Electric Usage Estimate

Electric Usage Estimate

Electric Usage Estimate

Electric Usage Estimate

AMD C-70 Intel Atom D2700
9 W Max TDP 10 W
NA Power consumption per day (kWh) NA
NA Running cost per day NA
NA Power consumption per year (kWh) NA
NA Running cost per year NA

Comments

back to top