| Intel Celeron N2808 | Intel Core i3-3250 | |
| 4.3 W | Max TDP | 55 W |
| NA | Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA |
| NA | Running cost per day | NA |
| NA | Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA |
| NA | Running cost per year | NA |
Intel Celeron N2808 vs Intel Core i3-3250
The Intel Celeron N2808 operates with 2 cores and 2 CPU threads. It run at 2.25 GHz base 2.25 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 4.3 W.The processor is attached to the BGA 1170 CPU socket. This version includes 1.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support DDR3L-1333 SO-DIMM RAM and features 2.0 PCIe Gen 4 lanes. Tjunction keeps below -- degrees C. In particular, Bay Trail Architecture is enhanced with 22 nm technology and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT. The product was launched on Q2/2014
The Intel Core i3-3250 operates with 2 cores and 2 CPU threads. It run at No turbo base No turbo all cores while the TDP is set at 55 W.The processor is attached to the LGA 1155 CPU socket. This version includes 3.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support DDR3-1600 RAM and features PCIe Gen lanes. Tjunction keeps below -- degrees C. In particular, Ivy Bridge S Architecture is enhanced with 22 nm technology and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d. The product was launched on Q2/2013
Intel Celeron N2808
Intel Core i3-3250
Compare Detail
| 1.58 GHz | Frequency | 3.50 GHz |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2.25 GHz | Turbo (1 Core) | No turbo |
| 2.25 GHz | Turbo (All Cores) | No turbo |
 No |
Hyperthreading | Yes  |
| No |
Overclocking | No |
| normal | Core Architecture | normal |
| Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1) | GPU | Intel HD Graphics 2500 |
| 0.79 GHz | GPU (Turbo) | 1.05 GHz |
| 22 nm | Technology | 22 nm |
| 0.79 GHz | GPU (Turbo) | 1.05 GHz |
| 11.2 | DirectX Version | 11.0 |
| 2 | Max. displays | 3 |
| DDR3L-1333 SO-DIMM | Memory | DDR3-1600 |
| 2 | Memory channels | 2 |
| Max memory | ||
| No |
ECC | No |
| -- | L2 Cache | -- |
| 1.00 MB | L3 Cache | 3.00 MB |
| 2.0 | PCIe version | |
| 4 | PCIe lanes | |
| 22 nm | Technology | 22 nm |
| BGA 1170 | Socket | LGA 1155 |
| 4.3 W | TDP | 55 W |
| VT-x, VT-x EPT | Virtualization | VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d |
| Q2/2014 | Release date | Q2/2013 |
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Intel Celeron N2808
39 (11%)
Intel Core i3-3250
128 (41%)
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Intel Celeron N2808
71 (1%)
Intel Core i3-3250
311 (3%)
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Intel Celeron N2808
(0%)
Intel Core i3-3250
678 (32%)
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Intel Celeron N2808
(0%)
Intel Core i3-3250
1,467 (4%)
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
Intel Celeron N2808
52 (0%)
Intel Core i3-3250
102 (1%)
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Intel Celeron N2808
805 (12%)
Intel Core i3-3250
2,730 (39%)
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Intel Celeron N2808
1,395 (1%)
Intel Core i3-3250
5,741 (6%)
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Intel Celeron N2808
0.46 (12%)
Intel Core i3-3250
1.54 (56%)
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Intel Celeron N2808
0.80 (1%)
Intel Core i3-3250
3.53 (6%)
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The iGPU test uses the CPU internal graphic unit to execute OpenGL commands.
Intel Celeron N2808
9.63 (15%)
Intel Core i3-3250
10.83 (18%)
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-Comparison. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-Comparison’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
Intel Celeron N2808
991 (1%)
Intel Core i3-3250
4,665 (5%)
Electric Usage Estimate
Electric Usage Estimate
Popular Comparision
Intel Celeron N2808 vs
Intel Atom Z3735F
Intel Celeron J1900 vs
Intel Celeron N2808
Intel Celeron N2808 vs
Intel Celeron N2807
Intel Celeron N2808 vs
Intel Celeron N3050
Intel Celeron N2808 vs
Intel Celeron N2830
AMD Athlon 5350 vs
Intel Celeron N2808
Intel Celeron N2808 vs
Intel Core i3-4360T
Intel Celeron N2808 vs
Intel Celeron 2955U
Intel Celeron N2808 vs
AMD E1-2100
Intel Celeron N2808 vs
AMD A8-6410
Intel Xeon E7-8857 v2 vs
Intel Celeron N2808
Intel Atom x5-Z8300 vs
Intel Celeron N2808
Intel Core M-5Y71 vs
Intel Celeron N2808
Intel Celeron N2808 vs
Intel Celeron N2930
Intel Celeron N2808 vs
Intel Core i3-3250
Intel Core i3-3250 vs
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T
AMD FX-6300 vs
Intel Core i3-3250
Intel Core i3-4150 vs
Intel Core i3-3250
AMD FX-4300 vs
Intel Core i3-3250
Intel Core i5-2500k vs
Intel Core i3-3250
Intel Core i3-3250 vs
AMD A6-6400K
Intel Core i3-3250 vs
Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3
Intel Core i3-3250 vs
Intel Xeon E7-4890 v2
Intel Core i3-3250 vs
Intel Core i3-4030U
Intel Celeron N3350 vs
Intel Core i3-3250
Intel Core i3-3250 vs
Intel Core i3-4005U
Intel Core i3-3250 vs
Intel Core i3-4130
AMD A4-5100 vs
Intel Core i3-3250
Intel Core i3-3250 vs
Intel Pentium G4560
Intel Xeon E5-2697A v4 vs
Intel Core i3-3250
Intel Core i3-3250 vs
AMD A8-3850
Intel Core i3-3250 vs
Intel Core i3-3240T
Intel Celeron 3215U vs
Intel Core i3-3250
Intel Pentium G4500 vs
Intel Core i3-3250
Intel Core i7-4770K vs
Intel Core i3-3250
Intel Core i3-3250 vs
AMD FX-9590
Intel Core i3-3250 vs
Intel Xeon E3-1225 v6
Intel Celeron N2808 vs
Intel Core i3-3250
Intel Celeron 2950M vs
Intel Core i3-3250
Intel Core i3-3250 vs
Intel Xeon Gold 6148F
Comments
