GET FREE $100 Welcome Offer
BUY AND SELL BTC, BNB, CAKE, DOGE, ETH AND 27 MORE
BUY AND SELL BTC,
BNB, CAKE, DOGE
ETH AND 27 MORE

AMD Opteron 3280 vs Intel Core i7-980

AMD Opteron 3280

The AMD Opteron 3280 operates with 8 cores and 8 CPU threads. It run at 3.50 GHz base 2.70 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 65 W.The processor is attached to the AM3+ CPU socket. This version includes 8.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support DDR3-1866 RAM and features 2.0 PCIe Gen 16 lanes. Tjunction keeps below -- degrees C. In particular, Zurich (Bulldozer) Architecture is enhanced with 32 nm technology and supports AMD-V. The product was launched on Q1/2012

AMD Opteron 3280

The Intel Core i7-980 operates with 6 cores and 8 CPU threads. It run at 3.60 GHz base -- all cores while the TDP is set at 130 W.The processor is attached to the LGA 1366 CPU socket. This version includes 12.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 3 memory channels to support DDR3-1066 RAM and features PCIe Gen lanes. Tjunction keeps below -- degrees C. In particular, Gulftown Architecture is enhanced with 32 nm technology and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT. The product was launched on Q2/2011


Compare Detail

2.40 GHz Frequency 3.33 GHz
8 Cores 6
3.50 GHz Turbo (1 Core) 3.60 GHz
2.70 GHz Turbo (All Cores) --
uncheck No Hyperthreading Yes check
uncheck No Overclocking No uncheck
normal Core Architecture normal
no iGPU GPU no iGPU
No turbo GPU (Turbo) No turbo
32 nm Technology 32 nm
No turbo GPU (Turbo) No turbo
DirectX Version
Max. displays
DDR3-1866 Memory DDR3-1066
2 Memory channels 3
Max memory
check Yes ECC No uncheck
-- L2 Cache 1.50 MB
8.00 MB L3 Cache 12.00 MB
2.0 PCIe version
16 PCIe lanes
32 nm Technology 32 nm
AM3+ Socket LGA 1366
65 W TDP 130 W
AMD-V Virtualization VT-x, VT-x EPT
Q1/2012 Release date Q2/2011

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

AMD Opteron 3280 507 (5%)
5% Complete
0% Complete

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.

0% Complete
Intel Core i7-980 618 (27%)
27% Complete

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

0% Complete
Intel Core i7-980 3,333 (7%)
7% Complete

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.

AMD Opteron 3280 927 (13%)
13% Complete
0% Complete

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

AMD Opteron 3280 3,025 (3%)
3% Complete
0% Complete

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-Comparison. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-Comparison’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.

AMD Opteron 3280 5,534 (5%)
5% Complete
Intel Core i7-980 6,612 (6%)
6% Complete
Electric Usage Estimate

Electric Usage Estimate

Electric Usage Estimate

Electric Usage Estimate

AMD Opteron 3280 Intel Core i7-980
65 W Max TDP 130 W
NA Power consumption per day (kWh) NA
NA Running cost per day NA
NA Power consumption per year (kWh) NA
NA Running cost per year NA

Comments

back to top