GET FREE $100 Welcome Offer
BUY AND SELL BTC, BNB, CAKE, DOGE, ETH AND 27 MORE
BUY AND SELL BTC,
BNB, CAKE, DOGE
ETH AND 27 MORE

AMD FX-9370 vs AMD Epyc 7451

AMD FX-9370

The AMD FX-9370 operates with 8 cores and 8 CPU threads. It run at 4.70 GHz base 4.70 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 220 W.The processor is attached to the AM3+ CPU socket. This version includes 8.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support DDR3-1866 RAM and features PCIe Gen lanes. Tjunction keeps below -- degrees C. In particular, Vishera (Piledriver) Architecture is enhanced with 32 nm technology and supports AMD-V. The product was launched on Q3/2013

AMD FX-9370

The AMD Epyc 7451 operates with 24 cores and 8 CPU threads. It run at 3.20 GHz base 2.90 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 180 W.The processor is attached to the SP3 CPU socket. This version includes 64.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 8 memory channels to support DDR4-2666 RAM and features 3.0 PCIe Gen 128 lanes. Tjunction keeps below -- degrees C. In particular, Naples (Zen) Architecture is enhanced with 14 nm technology and supports AMD-V, SVM. The product was launched on Q3/2017


Compare Detail

4.40 GHz Frequency 2.30 GHz
8 Cores 24
4.70 GHz Turbo (1 Core) 3.20 GHz
4.70 GHz Turbo (All Cores) 2.90 GHz
uncheck No Hyperthreading Yes check
check Yes Overclocking No uncheck
normal Core Architecture normal
no iGPU GPU no iGPU
No turbo GPU (Turbo) No turbo
32 nm Technology 14 nm
No turbo GPU (Turbo) No turbo
DirectX Version
Max. displays
DDR3-1866 Memory DDR4-2666
2 Memory channels 8
Max memory
check Yes ECC Yes check
-- L2 Cache --
8.00 MB L3 Cache 64.00 MB
PCIe version 3.0
PCIe lanes 128
32 nm Technology 14 nm
AM3+ Socket SP3
220 W TDP 180 W
AMD-V Virtualization AMD-V, SVM
Q3/2013 Release date Q3/2017

Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.

0% Complete
AMD Epyc 7451 322 (36%)
36% Complete

Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

0% Complete
AMD Epyc 7451 6,772 (27%)
27% Complete

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.

0% Complete
AMD Epyc 7451 147 (43%)
43% Complete

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

AMD FX-9370 700 (7%)
7% Complete
AMD Epyc 7451 3,282 (31%)
31% Complete

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.

AMD FX-9370 617 (27%)
27% Complete
0% Complete

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

AMD FX-9370 3,041 (6%)
6% Complete
0% Complete

Blender 2.81 (bmw27)

Blender is a free 3D graphics software for rendering (creating) 3D bodies, which can also be textured and animated in the software. The Blender benchmark creates predefined scenes and measures the time (s) required for the entire scene. The shorter the time required, the better. We selected bmw27 as the benchmark scene.

AMD FX-9370 787.95 (39%)
39% Complete
0% Complete

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.

AMD FX-9370 2,391 (34%)
34% Complete
AMD Epyc 7451 3,770 (54%)
54% Complete

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

AMD FX-9370 12,409 (13%)
13% Complete
AMD Epyc 7451 56,962 (60%)
60% Complete

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.

AMD FX-9370 1.40 (38%)
38% Complete
AMD Epyc 7451 1.79 (48%)
48% Complete

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

AMD FX-9370 8.40 (15%)
15% Complete
AMD Epyc 7451 33.26 (60%)
60% Complete

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-Comparison. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-Comparison’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.

AMD FX-9370 9,653 (9%)
9% Complete
AMD Epyc 7451 21,069 (20%)
20% Complete
Electric Usage Estimate

Electric Usage Estimate

Electric Usage Estimate

Electric Usage Estimate

AMD FX-9370 AMD Epyc 7451
220 W Max TDP 180 W
NA Power consumption per day (kWh) NA
NA Running cost per day NA
NA Power consumption per year (kWh) NA
NA Running cost per year NA

Comments

back to top