| AMD FX-4350 | Samsung Exynos 4212 | |
| 125 W | Max TDP | |
| NA | Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA |
| NA | Running cost per day | NA |
| NA | Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA |
| NA | Running cost per year | NA |
AMD FX-4350 vs Samsung Exynos 4212
The AMD FX-4350 operates with 4 cores and 4 CPU threads. It run at 4.30 GHz base 4.30 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 125 W.The processor is attached to the AM3+ CPU socket. This version includes 8.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support DDR3-1866 RAM and features PCIe Gen lanes. Tjunction keeps below -- degrees C. In particular, Vishera (Bulldozer) Architecture is enhanced with 32 nm technology and supports AMD-V. The product was launched on Q2/2013
The Samsung Exynos 4212 operates with 29 cores and 4 CPU threads. It run at -- base all cores while the TDP is set at .The processor is attached to the N/A CPU socket. This version includes -- of L3 cache on one chip, supports 0 memory channels to support LPDDR2-400 RAM and features PCIe Gen lanes. Tjunction keeps below -- degrees C. In particular, Cortex-A9 Architecture is enhanced with 32 nm technology and supports None. The product was launched on Q3/2011
Samsung Exynos 4212
Compare Detail
| 4.20 GHz | Frequency | 1.50 GHz |
| 4 | Cores | 29 |
| 4.30 GHz | Turbo (1 Core) | -- |
| 4.30 GHz | Turbo (All Cores) | |
 No |
Hyperthreading | No |
 Yes |
Overclocking | No |
| normal | Core Architecture | normal |
| no iGPU | GPU | ARM Mali-400 MP4 |
| No turbo | GPU (Turbo) | 0.40 GHz |
| 32 nm | Technology | 32 nm |
| No turbo | GPU (Turbo) | 0.40 GHz |
| DirectX Version | 0 | |
| Max. displays | 1 | |
| DDR3-1866 | Memory | LPDDR2-400 |
| 2 | Memory channels | 0 |
| Max memory | ||
| Yes |
ECC | No |
| -- | L2 Cache | 1.00 MB |
| 8.00 MB | L3 Cache | -- |
| PCIe version | ||
| PCIe lanes | ||
| 32 nm | Technology | 32 nm |
| AM3+ | Socket | N/A |
| 125 W | TDP | |
| AMD-V | Virtualization | None |
| Q2/2013 | Release date | Q3/2011 |
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
AMD FX-4350
578 (26%)
Samsung Exynos 4212
(0%)
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
AMD FX-4350
1,599 (3%)
Samsung Exynos 4212
(0%)
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
AMD FX-4350
(0%)
Samsung Exynos 4212
15 (0%)
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
AMD FX-4350
2,326 (34%)
Samsung Exynos 4212
(0%)
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
AMD FX-4350
6,821 (7%)
Samsung Exynos 4212
(0%)
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
AMD FX-4350
1.18 (32%)
Samsung Exynos 4212
(0%)
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
AMD FX-4350
3.65 (7%)
Samsung Exynos 4212
(0%)
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-Comparison. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-Comparison’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
AMD FX-4350
5,277 (5%)
Samsung Exynos 4212
(0%)
Electric Usage Estimate
Electric Usage Estimate
Popular Comparision
AMD FX-8350 vs
AMD FX-4350
AMD FX-4350 vs
AMD FX-6300
AMD Phenom II X4 965 vs
AMD FX-4350
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U vs
AMD FX-4350
AMD FX-4100 vs
AMD FX-4350
AMD FX-4320 vs
AMD FX-4350
AMD FX-4350 vs
AMD FX-6350
AMD FX-4350 vs
AMD FX-8120
AMD A8-7650K vs
AMD FX-4350
AMD FX-4350 vs
AMD FX-8370
AMD FX-4350 vs
AMD A8-6600K
Intel Core i3-4150 vs
AMD FX-4350
AMD Phenom II X4 840 vs
AMD FX-4350
Intel Core i5-3570 vs
AMD FX-4350
AMD FX-4350 vs
AMD A8-3850
Samsung Exynos 4212 vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 650
Apple A12Z Bionic vs
Samsung Exynos 4212
Intel Core i7-2640M vs
Samsung Exynos 4212
Samsung Exynos 4212 vs
Intel Xeon Gold 6240
Samsung Exynos 4212 vs
Intel Core i3-3217UE
Samsung Exynos 4212 vs
AMD E2-6110
Intel Atom N2800 vs
Samsung Exynos 4212
Samsung Exynos 4212 vs
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
AMD Ryzen Embedded V1404I vs
Samsung Exynos 4212
AMD FX-4350 vs
Samsung Exynos 4212
Intel Xeon W-3275 vs
Samsung Exynos 4212
Intel Xeon E7-2890 v2 vs
Samsung Exynos 4212
Samsung Exynos 4212 vs
Intel Core i5-4200Y
Samsung Exynos 4212 vs
Intel Core i3-6098P
Samsung Exynos 4212 vs
Intel Core i7-9700
Comments
