| AMD E-240 | AMD FX-4100 | |
| 18 W | Max TDP | 95 W |
| NA | Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA |
| NA | Running cost per day | NA |
| NA | Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA |
| NA | Running cost per year | NA |
AMD E-240 vs AMD FX-4100
The AMD E-240 operates with 1 cores and 1 CPU threads. It run at -- base -- all cores while the TDP is set at 18 W.The processor is attached to the BGA 413 CPU socket. This version includes 1.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 1 memory channels to support DDR3-1066 RAM and features PCIe Gen lanes. Tjunction keeps below -- degrees C. In particular, Zacate (Bobcat) Architecture is enhanced with 32 nm technology and supports AMD-V. The product was launched on Q1/2011
The AMD FX-4100 operates with 4 cores and 1 CPU threads. It run at 3.80 GHz base 3.80 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 95 W.The processor is attached to the AM3+ CPU socket. This version includes 8.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support DDR3-1866 RAM and features PCIe Gen lanes. Tjunction keeps below -- degrees C. In particular, Zambezi (Bulldozer) Architecture is enhanced with 32 nm technology and supports AMD-V. The product was launched on Q4/2011
Compare Detail
| 1.50 GHz | Frequency | 3.60 GHz |
| 1 | Cores | 4 |
| -- | Turbo (1 Core) | 3.80 GHz |
| -- | Turbo (All Cores) | 3.80 GHz |
 No |
Hyperthreading | No |
| No |
Overclocking | Yes  |
| normal | Core Architecture | normal |
| AMD Radeon HD 6310 | GPU | no iGPU |
| No turbo | GPU (Turbo) | No turbo |
| 32 nm | Technology | 32 nm |
| No turbo | GPU (Turbo) | No turbo |
| 11 | DirectX Version | |
| 2 | Max. displays | |
| DDR3-1066 | Memory | DDR3-1866 |
| 1 | Memory channels | 2 |
| Max memory | ||
| No |
ECC | Yes |
| -- | L2 Cache | -- |
| 1.00 MB | L3 Cache | 8.00 MB |
| PCIe version | ||
| PCIe lanes | ||
| 32 nm | Technology | 32 nm |
| BGA 413 | Socket | AM3+ |
| 18 W | TDP | 95 W |
| AMD-V | Virtualization | AMD-V |
| Q1/2011 | Release date | Q4/2011 |
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
AMD E-240
(0%)
AMD FX-4100
473 (21%)
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
AMD E-240
(0%)
AMD FX-4100
1,295 (3%)
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
AMD E-240
80 (0%)
AMD FX-4100
(0%)
Blender 2.81 (bmw27)
Blender is a free 3D graphics software for rendering (creating) 3D bodies, which can also be textured and animated in the software. The Blender benchmark creates predefined scenes and measures the time (s) required for the entire scene. The shorter the time required, the better. We selected bmw27 as the benchmark scene.
AMD E-240
(0%)
AMD FX-4100
1,786 (88%)
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
AMD E-240
533 (8%)
AMD FX-4100
1,866 (27%)
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
AMD E-240
530 (1%)
AMD FX-4100
5,361 (6%)
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
AMD E-240
(0%)
AMD FX-4100
0.97 (26%)
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
AMD E-240
0.27 (0%)
AMD FX-4100
2.96 (5%)
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-Comparison. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-Comparison’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
AMD E-240
372 (0%)
AMD FX-4100
4,052 (4%)
Electric Usage Estimate
Electric Usage Estimate
Popular Comparision
Intel Atom C2350 vs
AMD E-240
AMD E-240 vs
AMD E-350
Intel Core i3-3210 vs
AMD E-240
AMD E-240 vs
Intel Core i7-6650U
Intel Celeron N2810 vs
AMD E-240
AMD E-240 vs
Intel Core2 Duo E6700
AMD E-240 vs
AMD G-T52R
AMD E-240 vs
Intel Celeron J1900
AMD E-240 vs
Intel Atom Z3735F
Intel Celeron N2840 vs
AMD E-240
Intel Core i5-2500k vs
AMD E-240
AMD E-240 vs
AMD FX-6120
AMD E-240 vs
AMD Sempron 3850
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X vs
AMD E-240
Intel Core i7-4770K vs
AMD E-240
AMD FX-4100 vs
AMD FX-8300
AMD FX-4100 vs
AMD FX-6300
AMD Phenom II X4 955 vs
AMD FX-4100
AMD Phenom II X4 965 vs
AMD FX-4100
AMD FX-4100 vs
AMD FX-8350
AMD FX-4100 vs
AMD FX-8100
AMD FX-4100 vs
AMD FX-4350
AMD Athlon X4 845 vs
AMD FX-4100
AMD FX-4100 vs
AMD FX-8150
AMD FX-4100 vs
AMD FX-6350
AMD A8-3850 vs
AMD FX-4100
Intel Core i3-4150 vs
AMD FX-4100
AMD FX-8320 vs
AMD FX-4100
AMD FX-4150 vs
AMD FX-4100
AMD FX-4100 vs
AMD FX-8140
Comments
