| MediaTek MT6589T | AMD E2-3800 | |
| Max TDP | 15 W | |
| NA | Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA |
| NA | Running cost per day | NA |
| NA | Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA |
| NA | Running cost per year | NA |
MediaTek MT6589T vs AMD E2-3800
The MediaTek MT6589T operates with 47 cores and 4 CPU threads. It run at -- base all cores while the TDP is set at .The processor is attached to the N/A CPU socket. This version includes -- of L3 cache on one chip, supports 1 memory channels to support LPDDR2-533 RAM and features PCIe Gen lanes. Tjunction keeps below -- degrees C. In particular, Cortex-A9 Architecture is enhanced with 28 nm technology and supports None. The product was launched on Q3/2013
The AMD E2-3800 operates with 4 cores and 4 CPU threads. It run at -- base -- all cores while the TDP is set at 15 W.The processor is attached to the N/A CPU socket. This version includes 2.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 1 memory channels to support DDR3L-1600 SO-DIMM RAM and features PCIe Gen lanes. Tjunction keeps below -- degrees C. In particular, Llano (K10) Architecture is enhanced with 28 nm technology and supports AMD-V. The product was launched on Q4/2013
MediaTek MT6589T
Compare Detail
| 1.50 GHz | Frequency | 1.30 GHz |
| 47 | Cores | 4 |
| -- | Turbo (1 Core) | -- |
| Turbo (All Cores) | -- | |
 No |
Hyperthreading | No |
| No |
Overclocking | Yes  |
| normal | Core Architecture | normal |
| PowerVR SGX544 | GPU | AMD Radeon HD 8280 |
| 0.36 GHz | GPU (Turbo) | No turbo |
| 28 nm | Technology | 28 nm |
| 0.36 GHz | GPU (Turbo) | No turbo |
| DirectX Version | 11.1 | |
| 1 | Max. displays | 2 |
| LPDDR2-533 | Memory | DDR3L-1600 SO-DIMM |
| 1 | Memory channels | 1 |
| Max memory | ||
| No |
ECC | No |
| 1.00 MB | L2 Cache | -- |
| -- | L3 Cache | 2.00 MB |
| PCIe version | ||
| PCIe lanes | ||
| 28 nm | Technology | 28 nm |
| N/A | Socket | N/A |
| TDP | 15 W | |
| None | Virtualization | AMD-V |
| Q3/2013 | Release date | Q4/2013 |
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
MediaTek MT6589T
12 (0%)
AMD E2-3800
116 (1%)
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-Comparison. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-Comparison’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
MediaTek MT6589T
(0%)
AMD E2-3800
1,646 (2%)
Electric Usage Estimate
Electric Usage Estimate
Popular Comparision
MediaTek MT6589T vs
Intel Xeon X3440
Intel Core 2 Quad Q6400 vs
MediaTek MT6589T
MediaTek MT6589T vs
MediaTek Kompanio 500
MediaTek MT6589T vs
AMD Ryzen 7 5700G
MediaTek MT6589T vs
MediaTek MT8392
MediaTek MT6589T vs
Intel Xeon D-2738
Intel Core i3-12100T vs
MediaTek MT6589T
MediaTek MT6589T vs
Intel Core i7-1185G7
MediaTek MT6589T vs
AMD Ryzen 5 2600H
Intel Core i3-4160 vs
MediaTek MT6589T
Intel Core i3-12100 vs
MediaTek MT6589T
MediaTek MT6589T vs
Apple A15 Bionic (5-GPU)
MediaTek MT6589T vs
AMD E2-3800
MediaTek MT6589T vs
Intel Core i3-8100
MediaTek MT6589T vs
AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT
AMD E2-3800 vs
AMD E2-1800
AMD A4-5000 vs
AMD E2-3800
AMD E1-2100 vs
AMD E2-3800
Intel Celeron J1900 vs
AMD E2-3800
Intel Core i3-3227U vs
AMD E2-3800
AMD E2-3800 vs
AMD E2-6110
Intel Celeron J1800 vs
AMD E2-3800
AMD E2-3800 vs
AMD E1-6010
AMD E2-3800 vs
Intel Celeron N2930
AMD E2-2000 vs
AMD E2-3800
AMD E2-3800 vs
AMD E2-3000
Intel Pentium G2020 vs
AMD E2-3800
Intel Core i5-4200Y vs
AMD E2-3800
AMD E2-3800 vs
AMD A6-4400M
AMD A6-5357M vs
AMD E2-3800
Comments
