| MediaTek Kompanio 820 | Intel Xeon W-11955M | |
| Max TDP | 45 W | |
| NA | Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA |
| NA | Running cost per day | NA |
| NA | Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA |
| NA | Running cost per year | NA |
MediaTek Kompanio 820 vs Intel Xeon W-11955M
The MediaTek Kompanio 820 operates with 8 cores and 8 CPU threads. It run at 2.00 GHz (2.20 GHz) base -- all cores while the TDP is set at .The processor is attached to the N/A CPU socket. This version includes -- of L3 cache on one chip, supports 0 memory channels to support LPDDR4X-2133 RAM and features PCIe Gen lanes. Tjunction keeps below -- degrees C. In particular, Cortex-A76 / Cortex-A55 Architecture is enhanced with 7 nm technology and supports None. The product was launched on Q2/2021
The Intel Xeon W-11955M operates with 8 cores and 8 CPU threads. It run at 5.00 GHz base 3.20 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 45 W.The processor is attached to the BGA 1787 CPU socket. This version includes 24.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support DDR4-3200 RAM and features 4.0 PCIe Gen 20 lanes. Tjunction keeps below 100 °C degrees C. In particular, Tiger Lake H Architecture is enhanced with 10 nm technology and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d. The product was launched on Q2/2021
MediaTek Kompanio 820
Intel Xeon W-11955M
Compare Detail
| 2.00 GHz (2.20 GHz) | Frequency | 2.60 GHz |
| 8 | Cores | 8 |
| 2.00 GHz (2.20 GHz) | Turbo (1 Core) | 5.00 GHz |
| -- | Turbo (All Cores) | 3.20 GHz |
 No |
Hyperthreading | Yes  |
| No |
Overclocking | No |
| hybrid (big.LITTLE) | Core Architecture | normal |
| ARM Mali-G57 MP5 | GPU | Intel UHD Graphics 11th Gen (32 EU) |
| 0.01 GHz | GPU (Turbo) | 1.45 GHz |
| 7 nm | Technology | 10 nm |
| 0.01 GHz | GPU (Turbo) | 1.45 GHz |
| DirectX Version | 12 | |
| 2 | Max. displays | 3 |
| LPDDR4X-2133 | Memory | DDR4-3200 |
| 0 | Memory channels | 2 |
| Max memory | ||
| No |
ECC | Yes |
| -- | L2 Cache | -- |
| -- | L3 Cache | 24.00 MB |
| PCIe version | 4.0 | |
| PCIe lanes | 20 | |
| 7 nm | Technology | 10 nm |
| N/A | Socket | BGA 1787 |
| TDP | 45 W | |
| None | Virtualization | VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d |
| Q2/2021 | Release date | Q2/2021 |
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Intel Xeon W-11955M
1,583 (72%)
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Intel Xeon W-11955M
12,840 (20%)
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Intel Xeon W-11955M
619 (70%)
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Intel Xeon W-11955M
5,551 (22%)
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
MediaTek Kompanio 820
651 (29%)
Intel Xeon W-11955M
1,595 (71%)
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
MediaTek Kompanio 820
2,628 (5%)
Intel Xeon W-11955M
8,363 (17%)
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
Intel Xeon W-11955M
743 (4%)
AnTuTu 8 benchmark
The AnTuTu 8 Benchmark measures the performance of a SoC. AnTuTu benchmarks the CPU, GPU, Memory as well as the UX (User Experience) by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu can benchmark any ARM CPU that runs under Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly compareable if the benchmark has been performed under different operating systems.
MediaTek Kompanio 820
403,766 (56%)
Intel Xeon W-11955M
(0%)
Electric Usage Estimate
Electric Usage Estimate
Popular Comparision
MediaTek Kompanio 820 vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2
MediaTek Kompanio 820 vs
Intel Celeron N4500
MediaTek Kompanio 820 vs
MediaTek MT8176
MediaTek Kompanio 820 vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
MediaTek Kompanio 820 vs
Intel Core m3-6Y30
Intel Core i3-9100T vs
MediaTek Kompanio 820
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U vs
MediaTek Kompanio 820
Intel Core i5-12500 vs
MediaTek Kompanio 820
MediaTek Kompanio 820 vs
Intel Xeon D-2161I
AMD Epyc 7742 vs
MediaTek Kompanio 820
MediaTek Kompanio 820 vs
AMD Ryzen 3 5425U
Intel Xeon D-2183IT vs
MediaTek Kompanio 820
MediaTek Kompanio 820 vs
Intel Xeon W-11955M
Intel Core i5-10600K vs
MediaTek Kompanio 820
MediaTek Kompanio 820 vs
AMD Athlon 220GE
Intel Xeon W-11955M vs
Intel Core i9-11950H
Intel Xeon W-11955M vs
Intel Core i7-11850H
Intel Xeon W-11955M vs
Intel Xeon W-11855M
Intel Xeon W-11955M vs
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
Intel Xeon W-11955M vs
Intel Core i7-11800H
Apple M1 vs
Intel Xeon W-11955M
Intel Xeon W-11955M vs
Intel Core i9-11980HK
Intel Xeon W-11955M vs
Intel Xeon E-2186M
Intel Xeon W-11955M vs
Intel Core i9-11900K
Intel Xeon W-11955M vs
Intel Core i9-9900K
Intel Xeon W-11955M vs
Intel Core i9-9980HK
Apple M2 vs
Intel Xeon W-11955M
Intel Xeon W-11955M vs
Intel Core i7-11700
Intel Xeon W-11955M vs
Intel Core i9-10900K
Intel Core i9-12900K vs
Intel Xeon W-11955M
Comments
