| Intel Xeon Gold 6230N | AMD FX-6200 | |
| 125 W | Max TDP | 125 W |
| NA | Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA |
| NA | Running cost per day | NA |
| NA | Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA |
| NA | Running cost per year | NA |
Intel Xeon Gold 6230N vs AMD FX-6200
The Intel Xeon Gold 6230N operates with 20 cores and 40 CPU threads. It run at 3.50 GHz base 2.70 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 125 W.The processor is attached to the LGA 3647 CPU socket. This version includes 27.50 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 6 memory channels to support DDR4-2933 RAM and features 3.0 PCIe Gen 48 lanes. Tjunction keeps below -- degrees C. In particular, Cascade Lake Architecture is enhanced with 14 nm technology and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d. The product was launched on Q2/2019
The AMD FX-6200 operates with 6 cores and 40 CPU threads. It run at 4.10 GHz base 4.10 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 125 W.The processor is attached to the AM3+ CPU socket. This version includes 8.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support DDR3-1866 RAM and features PCIe Gen lanes. Tjunction keeps below -- degrees C. In particular, Zambezi (Bulldozer) Architecture is enhanced with 32 nm technology and supports AMD-V. The product was launched on Q2/2012
Intel Xeon Gold 6230N
Compare Detail
| 2.30 GHz | Frequency | 3.80 GHz |
| 20 | Cores | 6 |
| 3.50 GHz | Turbo (1 Core) | 4.10 GHz |
| 2.70 GHz | Turbo (All Cores) | 4.10 GHz |
 Yes |
Hyperthreading | No |
 No |
Overclocking | Yes |
| normal | Core Architecture | normal |
| no iGPU | GPU | no iGPU |
| No turbo | GPU (Turbo) | No turbo |
| 14 nm | Technology | 32 nm |
| No turbo | GPU (Turbo) | No turbo |
| DirectX Version | ||
| Max. displays | ||
| DDR4-2933 | Memory | DDR3-1866 |
| 6 | Memory channels | 2 |
| Max memory | ||
| Yes |
ECC | Yes |
| -- | L2 Cache | -- |
| 27.50 MB | L3 Cache | 8.00 MB |
| 3.0 | PCIe version | |
| 48 | PCIe lanes | |
| 14 nm | Technology | 32 nm |
| LGA 3647 | Socket | AM3+ |
| 125 W | TDP | 125 W |
| VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d | Virtualization | AMD-V |
| Q2/2019 | Release date | Q2/2012 |
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
AMD FX-6200
187 (21%)
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
AMD FX-6200
837 (3%)
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
AMD FX-6200
528 (23%)
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
AMD FX-6200
1,993 (4%)
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
AMD FX-6200
1,993 (29%)
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
AMD FX-6200
8,055 (8%)
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
AMD FX-6200
5 (28%)
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
AMD FX-6200
4.43 (8%)
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-Comparison. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-Comparison’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
AMD FX-6200
6,181 (6%)
Electric Usage Estimate
Electric Usage Estimate
Popular Comparision
Intel Xeon Gold 6230 vs
Intel Xeon Gold 6230N
Intel Xeon Gold 6230N vs
Intel Xeon Gold 6148
Intel Xeon Gold 6230N vs
Intel Xeon Gold 6252N
Intel Xeon Gold 6230N vs
Intel Xeon Gold 6248
Intel Xeon Gold 6230N vs
Intel Xeon Gold 6212U
Intel Xeon Gold 6230N vs
Intel Xeon Silver 4114
Intel Xeon Gold 6230N vs
AMD Epyc 7742
Intel Xeon Gold 6230N vs
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
Intel Xeon Gold 6230N vs
Intel Core i5-1035G4
Intel Xeon Gold 6230N vs
AMD FX-6200
Intel Xeon Gold 6230N vs
Intel Xeon W-2135
Intel Core i9-9980HK vs
Intel Xeon Gold 6230N
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 vs
Intel Xeon Gold 6230N
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X vs
Intel Xeon Gold 6230N
Intel Core i7-4510U vs
Intel Xeon Gold 6230N
AMD FX-6200 vs
AMD FX-8350
AMD Athlon II X2 340 vs
AMD FX-6200
AMD Phenom II X6 1100T vs
AMD FX-6200
Intel Core i5-2500k vs
AMD FX-6200
AMD Phenom II X4 955 vs
AMD FX-6200
AMD A4-3320M vs
AMD FX-6200
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T vs
AMD FX-6200
Intel Core i7-3770 vs
AMD FX-6200
Intel Pentium G2010 vs
AMD FX-6200
AMD A10-7850K vs
AMD FX-6200
AMD Phenom II X2 B55 vs
AMD FX-6200
AMD FX-6200 vs
AMD Phenom II X3 B75
Intel Core i7-3930k vs
AMD FX-6200
Intel Core i7-4770K vs
AMD FX-6200
AMD FX-9370 vs
AMD FX-6200
Comments
