Intel Core i5-1035G7 | Apple A5X | |
15 W | Max TDP | |
NA | Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA |
NA | Running cost per day | NA |
NA | Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA |
NA | Running cost per year | NA |
Intel Core i5-1035G7 vs Apple A5X
The Intel Core i5-1035G7 operates with 4 cores and 8 CPU threads. It run at 3.70 GHz base 3.30 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 15 W.The processor is attached to the BGA 1526 CPU socket. This version includes 6.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support DDR4-3200LPDDR4-3733 RAM and features 3.0 PCIe Gen 16 lanes. Tjunction keeps below 100 °C degrees C. In particular, Ice Lake U Architecture is enhanced with 10 nm technology and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d. The product was launched on Q3/2019
The Apple A5X operates with 29 cores and 8 CPU threads. It run at -- base all cores while the TDP is set at .The processor is attached to the N/A CPU socket. This version includes -- of L3 cache on one chip, supports 4 memory channels to support LPDDR2-800 RAM and features PCIe Gen lanes. Tjunction keeps below -- degrees C. In particular, A5 Architecture is enhanced with 32 nm technology and supports None. The product was launched on Q1/2011
Intel Core i5-1035G7
Compare Detail
1.20 GHz | Frequency | 1.00 GHz |
4 | Cores | 29 |
3.70 GHz | Turbo (1 Core) | -- |
3.30 GHz | Turbo (All Cores) | |
Yes | Hyperthreading | No |
No | Overclocking | No |
normal | Core Architecture | normal |
Intel Iris Plus Graphics (Ice Lake G7) | GPU | PowerVR SGX543MP4 (4 Cores) |
1.05 GHz | GPU (Turbo) | No turbo |
10 nm | Technology | 32 nm |
1.05 GHz | GPU (Turbo) | No turbo |
12 | DirectX Version | |
3 | Max. displays | 1 |
DDR4-3200LPDDR4-3733 | Memory | LPDDR2-800 |
2 | Memory channels | 4 |
Max memory | ||
No | ECC | No |
-- | L2 Cache | 1.00 MB |
6.00 MB | L3 Cache | -- |
3.0 | PCIe version | |
16 | PCIe lanes | |
10 nm | Technology | 32 nm |
BGA 1526 | Socket | N/A |
15 W | TDP | |
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d | Virtualization | None |
Q3/2019 | Release date | Q1/2011 |
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-Comparison. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-Comparison’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.