| Intel Core 2 Quad Q9700 | Intel Atom x5-Z8330 | |
| 95 W | Max TDP | 2 W |
| NA | Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA |
| NA | Running cost per day | NA |
| NA | Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA |
| NA | Running cost per year | NA |
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9700 vs Intel Atom x5-Z8330
The Intel Core 2 Quad Q9700 operates with 4 cores and 4 CPU threads. It run at -- base -- all cores while the TDP is set at 95 W.The processor is attached to the LGA 775 CPU socket. This version includes -- of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support DDR2-800DDR3-1066 RAM and features PCIe Gen lanes. Tjunction keeps below -- degrees C. In particular, Yorkfield (Penryn) Architecture is enhanced with 45 nm technology and supports VT-x, VT-d. The product was launched on Q1/2010
The Intel Atom x5-Z8330 operates with 4 cores and 4 CPU threads. It run at 1.92 GHz base -- all cores while the TDP is set at 2 W.The processor is attached to the BGA 138 CPU socket. This version includes -- of L3 cache on one chip, supports 1 memory channels to support DDR3L-1600 SO-DIMM RAM and features PCIe Gen lanes. Tjunction keeps below 90 °C degrees C. In particular, Cherry Trail Architecture is enhanced with 14 nm technology and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT. The product was launched on Q1/2016
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9700
Intel Atom x5-Z8330
Compare Detail
| 3.20 GHz | Frequency | 1.44 GHz |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| -- | Turbo (1 Core) | 1.92 GHz |
| -- | Turbo (All Cores) | -- |
 No |
Hyperthreading | No |
| No |
Overclocking | No |
| normal | Core Architecture | normal |
| no iGPU | GPU | Intel HD Graphics 400 |
| No turbo | GPU (Turbo) | 0.50 GHz |
| 45 nm | Technology | 14 nm |
| No turbo | GPU (Turbo) | 0.50 GHz |
| DirectX Version | ||
| Max. displays | 3 | |
| DDR2-800DDR3-1066 | Memory | DDR3L-1600 SO-DIMM |
| 2 | Memory channels | 1 |
| Max memory | ||
| No |
ECC | No |
| 6.00 MB | L2 Cache | 2.00 MB |
| -- | L3 Cache | -- |
| PCIe version | ||
| PCIe lanes | ||
| 45 nm | Technology | 14 nm |
| LGA 775 | Socket | BGA 138 |
| 95 W | TDP | 2 W |
| VT-x, VT-d | Virtualization | VT-x, VT-x EPT |
| Q1/2010 | Release date | Q1/2016 |
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9700
496 (22%)
Intel Atom x5-Z8330
(0%)
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9700
1,859 (3%)
Intel Atom x5-Z8330
(0%)
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9700
486 (21%)
Intel Atom x5-Z8330
(0%)
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9700
1,625 (3%)
Intel Atom x5-Z8330
(0%)
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
Intel Atom x5-Z8330
106 (0%)
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-Comparison. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-Comparison’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9700
2,533 (2%)
Intel Atom x5-Z8330
(0%)
Electric Usage Estimate
Electric Usage Estimate
Popular Comparision
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9700 vs
Intel Core2 Duo E8700
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9700 vs
Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9700 vs
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650
Intel Core 2 Quad Q8300 vs
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9700
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9700 vs
AMD Athlon II X4 651K
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ vs
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9700
Apple A13 Bionic vs
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9700
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9700 vs
Intel Pentium Gold 4425Y
Intel Pentium E5800 vs
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9700
Intel Core i7-7700 vs
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9700
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9700 vs
AMD Ryzen 5 4400GE
Intel Celeron N6210 vs
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9700
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9700 vs
Intel Celeron N5095
Intel Core i7-3930k vs
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9700
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G vs
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9700
AMD Ryzen 7 5700G vs
Intel Atom x5-Z8330
AMD A4-5100 vs
Intel Atom x5-Z8330
Intel Core i7-1185G7 vs
Intel Atom x5-Z8330
Intel Core i7-1165G7 vs
Intel Atom x5-Z8330
Intel Atom x5-Z8330 vs
Intel Celeron 4305U
Intel Atom Z3735F vs
Intel Atom x5-Z8330
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 vs
Intel Atom x5-Z8330
Intel Atom x5-Z8350 vs
Intel Atom x5-Z8330
Intel Celeron 3205U vs
Intel Atom x5-Z8330
Intel Pentium Gold G5420T vs
Intel Atom x5-Z8330
AMD Ryzen 3 5300G vs
Intel Atom x5-Z8330
Intel Core i5-12600 vs
Intel Atom x5-Z8330
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9700 vs
Intel Atom x5-Z8330
Intel Atom x5-Z8330 vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 427
AMD Athlon II X3 420e vs
Intel Atom x5-Z8330
Comments
