| AMD FX-4170 | Samsung Exynos 5800 | |
| 125 W | Max TDP | |
| NA | Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA |
| NA | Running cost per day | NA |
| NA | Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA |
| NA | Running cost per year | NA |
AMD FX-4170 vs Samsung Exynos 5800
The AMD FX-4170 operates with 4 cores and 4 CPU threads. It run at 4.40 GHz base 4.40 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 125 W.The processor is attached to the AM3+ CPU socket. This version includes 8.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support DDR3-1866 RAM and features PCIe Gen lanes. Tjunction keeps below -- degrees C. In particular, Zambezi (Bulldozer) Architecture is enhanced with 32 nm technology and supports AMD-V. The product was launched on Q1/2012
The Samsung Exynos 5800 operates with 8 cores and 4 CPU threads. It run at 2.00 GHz base 1.30 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at .The processor is attached to the N/A CPU socket. This version includes -- of L3 cache on one chip, supports 0 memory channels to support LPDDR3-933 RAM and features PCIe Gen lanes. Tjunction keeps below -- degrees C. In particular, Cortex-A15 / Cortex-A7 Architecture is enhanced with 28 nm technology and supports None. The product was launched on Q2/2014
Samsung Exynos 5800
Compare Detail
| 4.20 GHz | Frequency | 2.00 GHz |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 4.40 GHz | Turbo (1 Core) | 2.00 GHz |
| 4.40 GHz | Turbo (All Cores) | 1.30 GHz |
 No |
Hyperthreading | No |
 Yes |
Overclocking | No |
| normal | Core Architecture | hybrid (big.LITTLE) |
| no iGPU | GPU | ARM Mali-T628 MP6 |
| No turbo | GPU (Turbo) | 0.60 GHz |
| 32 nm | Technology | 28 nm |
| No turbo | GPU (Turbo) | 0.60 GHz |
| DirectX Version | 11 | |
| Max. displays | 1 | |
| DDR3-1866 | Memory | LPDDR3-933 |
| 2 | Memory channels | 0 |
| Max memory | ||
| Yes |
ECC | No |
| -- | L2 Cache | -- |
| 8.00 MB | L3 Cache | -- |
| PCIe version | ||
| PCIe lanes | ||
| 32 nm | Technology | 28 nm |
| AM3+ | Socket | N/A |
| 125 W | TDP | |
| AMD-V | Virtualization | None |
| Q1/2012 | Release date | Q2/2014 |
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
AMD FX-4170
521 (23%)
Samsung Exynos 5800
(0%)
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
AMD FX-4170
1,414 (3%)
Samsung Exynos 5800
(0%)
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
AMD FX-4170
(0%)
Samsung Exynos 5800
116 (1%)
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
AMD FX-4170
2,339 (34%)
Samsung Exynos 5800
(0%)
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
AMD FX-4170
7,061 (7%)
Samsung Exynos 5800
(0%)
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
AMD FX-4170
1.07 (29%)
Samsung Exynos 5800
(0%)
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
AMD FX-4170
3.29 (6%)
Samsung Exynos 5800
(0%)
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-Comparison. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-Comparison’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
AMD FX-4170
4,771 (4%)
Samsung Exynos 5800
(0%)
Electric Usage Estimate
Electric Usage Estimate
Popular Comparision
Intel Core i3-4130 vs
AMD FX-4170
AMD FX-4170 vs
AMD FX-4300
AMD FX-4170 vs
AMD FX-9370
AMD A8-6600K vs
AMD FX-4170
Intel Core i3-4000M vs
AMD FX-4170
Intel Core i5-4690 vs
AMD FX-4170
AMD FX-4170 vs
AMD FX-9590
AMD FX-4170 vs
Intel Core i7-4790K
Intel Core i5-2500k vs
AMD FX-4170
Intel Core i5-4200M vs
AMD FX-4170
AMD FX-4170 vs
AMD Phenom II X4 840T
AMD Phenom II X4 905e vs
AMD FX-4170
AMD FX-4170 vs
Intel Core i5-4460T
Intel Core i7-4770K vs
AMD FX-4170
Intel Xeon E3-1275 v5 vs
AMD FX-4170
Samsung Exynos 5800 vs
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X vs
Samsung Exynos 5800
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X vs
Samsung Exynos 5800
Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 vs
Samsung Exynos 5800
Intel Celeron N4020 vs
Samsung Exynos 5800
Samsung Exynos 5800 vs
Intel Core i5-4440S
Samsung Exynos 5800 vs
Intel Core i7-6800K
Samsung Exynos 5800 vs
Intel Core i5-10600KF
Samsung Exynos 5800 vs
Intel Core i7-10750H
Samsung Exynos 5800 vs
Intel Core i7-4860EQ
Samsung Exynos 5800 vs
AMD Epyc 7302P
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 vs
Samsung Exynos 5800
AMD E2-1800 vs
Samsung Exynos 5800
Samsung Exynos 5800 vs
AMD Ryzen 7 4700U
AMD FX-4170 vs
Samsung Exynos 5800
Comments
