| AMD EPYC 9374F | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X | |
| 0 | Max TDP | 280 W |
| NA | Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA |
| NA | Running cost per day | NA |
| NA | Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA |
| NA | Running cost per year | NA |
AMD EPYC 9374F vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
The AMD EPYC 9374F operates with 324 cores and 64 CPU threads. It run at 4.30 GHz base all cores while the TDP is set at 45 W.The processor is attached to the SP5 CPU socket. This version includes 256.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 12 memory channels to support DDR5-4800 RAM and features PCIe Gen lanes. Tjunction keeps below 100 °C degrees C. In particular, Genoa (Zen 4) Architecture is enhanced with 5 nm technology and supports AMD-V, SVM. The product was launched on Q4/2022
The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X operates with 24 cores and 64 CPU threads. It run at 4.50 GHz base 4.00 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 280 W.The processor is attached to the TRX4 (sTRX4) CPU socket. This version includes 128.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 4 memory channels to support DDR4-3200 RAM and features 4.0 PCIe Gen 72 lanes. Tjunction keeps below 95 °C degrees C. In particular, Castle Peak (Zen 2) Architecture is enhanced with 7 nm technology and supports AMD-V, SVM. The product was launched on Q4/2019
AMD EPYC 9374F
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
Compare Detail
| 3.85 GHz | Frequency | 3.80 GHz |
| 324 | Cores | 24 |
| 4.30 GHz | Turbo (1 Core) | 4.50 GHz |
| Turbo (All Cores) | 4.00 GHz | |
 Yes |
Hyperthreading | Yes |
 No |
Overclocking | Yes |
| normal | Core Architecture | normal |
| no iGPU | GPU | no iGPU |
| No turbo | GPU (Turbo) | No turbo |
| 5 nm | Technology | 7 nm |
| No turbo | GPU (Turbo) | No turbo |
| DirectX Version | ||
| Max. displays | ||
| DDR5-4800 | Memory | DDR4-3200 |
| 12 | Memory channels | 4 |
| Max memory | ||
| Yes |
ECC | Yes |
| 32.00 MB | L2 Cache | -- |
| 256.00 MB | L3 Cache | 128.00 MB |
| PCIe version | 4.0 | |
| PCIe lanes | 72 | |
| 5 nm | Technology | 7 nm |
| SP5 | Socket | TRX4 (sTRX4) |
| TDP | 280 W | |
| AMD-V, SVM | Virtualization | AMD-V, SVM |
| Q4/2022 | Release date | Q4/2019 |
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
AMD EPYC 9374F
(0%)
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
1,277 (58%)
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
AMD EPYC 9374F
(0%)
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
34,262 (53%)
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
AMD EPYC 9374F
(0%)
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
516 (58%)
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
AMD EPYC 9374F
(0%)
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
13,559 (54%)
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
AMD EPYC 9374F
(0%)
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
217 (63%)
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
AMD EPYC 9374F
(0%)
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
5,940 (56%)
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
AMD EPYC 9374F
(0%)
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
1,281 (57%)
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
AMD EPYC 9374F
(0%)
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
19,857 (40%)
Blender 2.81 (bmw27)
Blender is a free 3D graphics software for rendering (creating) 3D bodies, which can also be textured and animated in the software. The Blender benchmark creates predefined scenes and measures the time (s) required for the entire scene. The shorter the time required, the better. We selected bmw27 as the benchmark scene.
AMD EPYC 9374F
(0%)
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
59.21 (3%)
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-Comparison. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-Comparison’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
AMD EPYC 9374F
99,091 (79%)
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
55,039 (51%)
Monero Hashrate kH/s
The crypto currency Monero has been using the RandomX algorithm since November 2019. This PoW (proof of work) algorithm can only efficiently be calculated using a processor (CPU) or a graphics card (GPU). The CryptoNight algorithm was used for Monero until November 2019, but it could be calculated using ASICs. RandomX benefits from a high number of CPU cores, cache and a fast connection of the memory via as many memory channels as possible
AMD EPYC 9374F
(0%)
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
28 (25%)
Electric Usage Estimate
Electric Usage Estimate
Popular Comparision
AMD EPYC 9354 vs
AMD EPYC 9374F
AMD EPYC 9374F vs
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
AMD EPYC 9374F vs
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
AMD EPYC 9374F vs
AMD EPYC 7543
Intel Xeon Gold 6348H vs
AMD EPYC 9374F
AMD EPYC 9374F vs
AMD EPYC 9174F
AMD EPYC 9374F vs
Intel Xeon Gold 6348
Intel Core i5-3475S vs
AMD EPYC 9374F
AMD EPYC 9374F vs
Intel Core i7-2649M
Intel Xeon Gold 6246R vs
AMD EPYC 9374F
AMD EPYC 9374F vs
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
AMD E1-1200 vs
AMD EPYC 9374F
AMD EPYC 9374F vs
Intel Celeron N2815
Intel Xeon E5-2650L v4 vs
AMD EPYC 9374F
Intel Core2 Duo E8600 vs
AMD EPYC 9374F
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X vs
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X vs
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X
Intel Core i9-10980XE vs
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X vs
Intel Core i9-9900K
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X vs
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
Intel Core i9-12900K vs
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X vs
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X vs
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX vs
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X vs
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
Intel Core i9-10900K vs
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX vs
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X vs
Intel Core i9-10920X
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X vs
Intel Core i9-9980XE
Intel Xeon W-3175X vs
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
Comments
