GET FREE $100 Welcome Offer
BUY AND SELL BTC, BNB, CAKE, DOGE, ETH AND 27 MORE
BUY AND SELL BTC,
BNB, CAKE, DOGE
ETH AND 27 MORE

AMD A8-3800 vs Intel Xeon E7-8880L v2

AMD A8-3800

The AMD A8-3800 operates with 4 cores and 4 CPU threads. It run at 2.70 GHz base 2.70 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 65 W.The processor is attached to the FM1 CPU socket. This version includes 4.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support DDR3-1600 RAM and features PCIe Gen lanes. Tjunction keeps below -- degrees C. In particular, Llano (K10) Architecture is enhanced with 32 nm technology and supports AMD-V. The product was launched on Q3/2011

AMD A8-3800

The Intel Xeon E7-8880L v2 operates with 15 cores and 4 CPU threads. It run at 2.80 GHz base 2.80 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 105 W.The processor is attached to the LGA 2011 CPU socket. This version includes 38.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 4 memory channels to support DDR3-1600 RAM and features PCIe Gen lanes. Tjunction keeps below -- degrees C. In particular, Ivy Bridge EX Architecture is enhanced with 22 nm technology and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d. The product was launched on Q1/2014


Compare Detail

2.40 GHz Frequency 2.20 GHz
4 Cores 15
2.70 GHz Turbo (1 Core) 2.80 GHz
2.70 GHz Turbo (All Cores) 2.80 GHz
uncheck No Hyperthreading Yes check
check Yes Overclocking No uncheck
normal Core Architecture normal
AMD Radeon HD 6550D GPU no iGPU
No turbo GPU (Turbo) No turbo
32 nm Technology 22 nm
No turbo GPU (Turbo) No turbo
11 DirectX Version
2 Max. displays
DDR3-1600 Memory DDR3-1600
2 Memory channels 4
Max memory
uncheck No ECC Yes check
-- L2 Cache --
4.00 MB L3 Cache 38.00 MB
PCIe version
PCIe lanes
32 nm Technology 22 nm
FM1 Socket LGA 2011
65 W TDP 105 W
AMD-V Virtualization VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
Q3/2011 Release date Q1/2014

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.

AMD A8-3800 481 (5%)
5% Complete
0% Complete

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.

AMD A8-3800 1,359 (20%)
20% Complete
0% Complete

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

AMD A8-3800 4,739 (5%)
5% Complete
0% Complete

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

AMD A8-3800 2.92 (5%)
5% Complete
0% Complete

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)

Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The iGPU test uses the CPU internal graphic unit to execute OpenGL commands.

AMD A8-3800 24.66 (40%)
40% Complete
0% Complete

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-Comparison. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-Comparison’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.

AMD A8-3800 3,189 (4%)
4% Complete
Intel Xeon E7-8880L v2 31,902 (30%)
30% Complete
Electric Usage Estimate

Electric Usage Estimate

Electric Usage Estimate

Electric Usage Estimate

AMD A8-3800 Intel Xeon E7-8880L v2
65 W Max TDP 105 W
NA Power consumption per day (kWh) NA
NA Running cost per day NA
NA Power consumption per year (kWh) NA
NA Running cost per year NA

Popular Comparision

Comments

back to top