| Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 | |
| 130 W | Max TDP | |
| NA | 每天耗电量（kWh） | NA |
| NA | 每天的运行成本 | NA |
| NA | 每年耗电量（kWh） | NA |
| NA | 每年的运行成本 | NA |
Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650与4内核和4 CPU线程一起运行。它在运行--基地--所有内核，而TDP设定在130 W 。处理器已连接到LGA 775 CPU插槽。该版本--的L3高速缓存，支持2存储器通道以支持DDR2-800DDR3-1066 RAM，并具有 PCIe Gen 通道。 Tjunction保持在--摄氏度以下。特别是， Yorkfield (Penryn)体系结构通过45 nm技术进行了VT-x, VT-d 。该产品于Q4/2007
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1与8内核和4 CPU线程一起运行。它在运行3.00 GHz基地1.80 GHz所有内核，而TDP设定在 。处理器已连接到N/A CPU插槽。该版本6.00 MB的L3高速缓存，支持4存储器通道以支持LPDDR5-6400 RAM，并具有 PCIe Gen 通道。 Tjunction保持在--摄氏度以下。特别是， Cortex-X2 / -A710 / -A510体系结构通过4 nm技术进行了None 。该产品于Q1/2022
Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
比较细节
| 3.00 GHz | 频率 | 3.00 GHz |
| 4 | 核心数 | 8 |
| -- | Turbo（1核心） | 3.00 GHz |
| -- | Turbo（所有内核） | 1.80 GHz |
 No |
超线程 | No |
 Yes |
超频 | No |
| normal | 核心架构 | hybrid (Prime / big.LITTLE) |
| no iGPU | GPU | Qualcomm Adreno 730 |
| No turbo | GPU（涡轮增压） | No turbo |
| 45 nm | 技术 | 4 nm |
| No turbo | GPU（涡轮增压） | No turbo |
| DirectX版本 | 12.1 | |
| 最大限度。展示 | 0 | |
| DDR2-800DDR3-1066 | 记忆 | LPDDR5-6400 |
| 2 | 记忆通道 | 4 |
| 最大记忆体 | ||
| No |
ECC | No |
| 12.00 MB | L2 Cache | 2.00 MB |
| -- | L3 Cache | 6.00 MB |
| PCIe版本 | ||
| PCIe lanes | ||
| 45 nm | 技术 | 4 nm |
| LGA 775 | 插座 | N/A |
| 130 W | 贸易发展计划 | |
| VT-x, VT-d | 虚拟化 | None |
| Q4/2007 | 发布日期 | Q1/2022 |
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5是一个跨平台基准测试，大量使用系统内存。快速的记忆将大大推动结果。单核测试仅使用一个CPU核，核的数量或超线程能力不计算在内。
Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650
435 (19%)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
1,236 (55%)
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5是一个跨平台基准测试，大量使用系统内存。快速的记忆将大大推动结果。多核测试涉及所有CPU核，并具有超线程的巨大优势。
Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650
1,518 (3%)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
3,829 (8%)
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
GFLOPS中具有简单精度（32位）的处理器内部图形单元的理论计算性能。 GFLOPS表示iGPU每秒可以执行多少亿个浮点运算。
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
2,239 (11%)
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
下面列出的某些CPU已通过CPU比较进行了基准测试。但是，大多数CPU尚未经过测试，并且根据CPU比较器的秘密专有公式估算了结果。因此，它们无法准确反映Passmark CPU的实际标记值，并且未被PassMark Software Pty Ltd认可。
Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650
2,440 (2%)
用电量估算
用电量估算
流行比较
Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650 vs
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9650
Intel Core 2 Quad Q8400 vs
Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650
Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650 vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650 vs
Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9770
Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650 vs
Intel Core2 Duo E8500
Intel Core 2 Extreme QX6850 vs
Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650
Intel Core i9-12900K vs
Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650
Intel Celeron N5105 vs
Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650
Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650 vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus
Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650 vs
Intel Pentium E5700
Intel Xeon Gold 5218T vs
Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650
Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650 vs
Intel Core i7-950
Intel Celeron E1600 vs
Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650
Intel Core i5-1135G7 vs
Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650
Intel Core i7-7700K vs
Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9650
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 vs
Apple M1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 vs
Apple A15 Bionic (5-GPU)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
MediaTek Dimensity 8100 vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen. 2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 vs
Google Tensor
Samsung Exynos 2100 vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 vs
Apple A13 Bionic
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 vs
Apple A14 Bionic
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
Intel Core i5-1230U vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
Comments
