GET FREE $100 Welcome Offer
BUY AND SELL BTC, BNB, CAKE, DOGE, ETH AND 27 MORE
BUY AND SELL BTC,
BNB, CAKE, DOGE
ETH AND 27 MORE

MediaTek MT8389T vs Intel Xeon Platinum 8160T

MediaTek MT8389T

The MediaTek MT8389T operates with 47 cores and 4 CPU threads. It run at -- base all cores while the TDP is set at .The processor is attached to the N/A CPU socket. This version includes -- of L3 cache on one chip, supports 0 memory channels to support LPDDR2 RAM and features PCIe Gen lanes. Tjunction keeps below -- degrees C. In particular, Cortex-A7 Architecture is enhanced with 28 nm technology and supports None. The product was launched on Q2/2013

MediaTek MT8389T

The Intel Xeon Platinum 8160T operates with 24 cores and 4 CPU threads. It run at 3.70 GHz base 2.60 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 150 W.The processor is attached to the LGA 3647 CPU socket. This version includes 33.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 6 memory channels to support DDR4-2666 RAM and features 3.0 PCIe Gen 48 lanes. Tjunction keeps below -- degrees C. In particular, Skylake Architecture is enhanced with 14 nm technology and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d. The product was launched on Q3/2017


Compare Detail

1.50 GHz Frequency 2.10 GHz
47 Cores 24
-- Turbo (1 Core) 3.70 GHz
Turbo (All Cores) 2.60 GHz
uncheck No Hyperthreading Yes check
uncheck No Overclocking No uncheck
normal Core Architecture normal
PowerVR SGX544 GPU no iGPU
0.36 GHz GPU (Turbo) No turbo
28 nm Technology 14 nm
0.36 GHz GPU (Turbo) No turbo
DirectX Version
1 Max. displays
LPDDR2 Memory DDR4-2666
0 Memory channels 6
Max memory
uncheck No ECC Yes check
1.00 MB L2 Cache --
-- L3 Cache 33.00 MB
PCIe version 3.0
PCIe lanes 48
28 nm Technology 14 nm
N/A Socket LGA 3647
TDP 150 W
None Virtualization VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
Q2/2013 Release date Q3/2017

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.

0% Complete
49% Complete

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

0% Complete
33% Complete

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.

0% Complete
0% Complete

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.

0% Complete
60% Complete

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

0% Complete
68% Complete

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.

0% Complete
53% Complete

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

0% Complete
69% Complete
Electric Usage Estimate

Electric Usage Estimate

Electric Usage Estimate

Electric Usage Estimate

MediaTek MT8389T Intel Xeon Platinum 8160T
Max TDP 150 W
NA Power consumption per day (kWh) NA
NA Running cost per day NA
NA Power consumption per year (kWh) NA
NA Running cost per year NA

Comments

back to top