GET FREE $100 Welcome Offer
BUY AND SELL BTC, BNB, CAKE, DOGE, ETH AND 27 MORE
BUY AND SELL BTC,
BNB, CAKE, DOGE
ETH AND 27 MORE

MediaTek MT6732 vs Intel Celeron N5095

MediaTek MT6732

The MediaTek MT6732 operates with 453 cores and 4 CPU threads. It run at -- base all cores while the TDP is set at .The processor is attached to the N/A CPU socket. This version includes -- of L3 cache on one chip, supports 1 memory channels to support LPDDR3-800 RAM and features PCIe Gen lanes. Tjunction keeps below -- degrees C. In particular, Cortex-A53 Architecture is enhanced with 28 nm technology and supports None. The product was launched on Q3/2014

MediaTek MT6732

The Intel Celeron N5095 operates with 4 cores and 4 CPU threads. It run at 2.90 GHz base 2.50 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 15 W.The processor is attached to the BGA 1338 CPU socket. This version includes 4.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support DDR4-2933LPDDR4-2933 RAM and features 3.0 PCIe Gen 8 lanes. Tjunction keeps below 105 °C degrees C. In particular, Jasper Lake Architecture is enhanced with 10 nm technology and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d. The product was launched on Q1/2021


Compare Detail

1.50 GHz Frequency 2.00 GHz
453 Cores 4
-- Turbo (1 Core) 2.90 GHz
Turbo (All Cores) 2.50 GHz
uncheck No Hyperthreading No
uncheck No Overclocking No uncheck
normal Core Architecture normal
ARM Mali-T760 MP2 GPU Intel UHD Graphics 16 EUs (Jasper Lake)
0.50 GHz GPU (Turbo) 0.75 GHz
28 nm Technology 10 nm
0.50 GHz GPU (Turbo) 0.75 GHz
DirectX Version 12
2 Max. displays 3
LPDDR3-800 Memory DDR4-2933LPDDR4-2933
1 Memory channels 2
Max memory
uncheck No ECC No uncheck
-- L2 Cache 1.50 MB
-- L3 Cache 4.00 MB
PCIe version 3.0
PCIe lanes 8
28 nm Technology 10 nm
N/A Socket BGA 1338
TDP 15 W
None Virtualization VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
Q3/2014 Release date Q1/2021

Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.

0% Complete
28% Complete

Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

0% Complete
Intel Celeron N5095 2,228 (3%)
3% Complete

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.

0% Complete
30% Complete

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

0% Complete
Intel Celeron N5095 2,198 (4%)
4% Complete

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.

MediaTek MT6732 29 (0%)
0% Complete
2% Complete

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-Comparison. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-Comparison’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.

0% Complete
Intel Celeron N5095 4,022 (4%)
4% Complete
Electric Usage Estimate

Electric Usage Estimate

Electric Usage Estimate

Electric Usage Estimate

MediaTek MT6732 Intel Celeron N5095
Max TDP 15 W
NA Power consumption per day (kWh) NA
NA Running cost per day NA
NA Power consumption per year (kWh) NA
NA Running cost per year NA

Comments

back to top