MediaTek MT6570 | Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550s | |
Max TDP | 65 W | |
NA | Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA |
NA | Running cost per day | NA |
NA | Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA |
NA | Running cost per year | NA |
MediaTek MT6570 vs Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550s
The MediaTek MT6570 operates with 27 cores and 2 CPU threads. It run at -- base all cores while the TDP is set at .The processor is attached to the N/A CPU socket. This version includes -- of L3 cache on one chip, supports 0 memory channels to support LPDDR2 RAM and features PCIe Gen lanes. Tjunction keeps below -- degrees C. In particular, Cortex-A9 Architecture is enhanced with 28 nm technology and supports None. The product was launched on 2015
The Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550s operates with 4 cores and 2 CPU threads. It run at -- base -- all cores while the TDP is set at 65 W.The processor is attached to the LGA 775 CPU socket. This version includes -- of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support DDR2-800DDR3-1066 RAM and features PCIe Gen lanes. Tjunction keeps below -- degrees C. In particular, Yorkfield (Penryn) Architecture is enhanced with 45 nm technology and supports VT-x, VT-d. The product was launched on Q1/2008
MediaTek MT6570
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550s
Compare Detail
1.30 GHz | Frequency | 2.83 GHz |
27 | Cores | 4 |
-- | Turbo (1 Core) | -- |
Turbo (All Cores) | -- | |
No | Hyperthreading | No |
No | Overclocking | No |
normal | Core Architecture | normal |
ARM Mali-400 | GPU | no iGPU |
0.01 GHz | GPU (Turbo) | No turbo |
28 nm | Technology | 45 nm |
0.01 GHz | GPU (Turbo) | No turbo |
DirectX Version | ||
1 | Max. displays | |
LPDDR2 | Memory | DDR2-800DDR3-1066 |
0 | Memory channels | 2 |
Max memory | ||
No | ECC | No |
-- | L2 Cache | 12.00 MB |
-- | L3 Cache | -- |
PCIe version | ||
PCIe lanes | ||
28 nm | Technology | 45 nm |
N/A | Socket | LGA 775 |
TDP | 65 W | |
None | Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d |
2015 | Release date | Q1/2008 |
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-Comparison. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-Comparison’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.