MediaTek Helio P18 | Intel Core i7-5850EQ | |
Max TDP | 47 W | |
NA | Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA |
NA | Running cost per day | NA |
NA | Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA |
NA | Running cost per year | NA |
MediaTek Helio P18 vs Intel Core i7-5850EQ
The MediaTek Helio P18 operates with 8 cores and 8 CPU threads. It run at 2.00 GHz (2.00 GHz) base -- all cores while the TDP is set at .The processor is attached to the N/A CPU socket. This version includes -- of L3 cache on one chip, supports 1 memory channels to support LPDDR3-933 RAM and features PCIe Gen lanes. Tjunction keeps below -- degrees C. In particular, Cortex-A53 Architecture is enhanced with 28 nm technology and supports None. The product was launched on Q1/2018
The Intel Core i7-5850EQ operates with 4 cores and 8 CPU threads. It run at 3.40 GHz base 3.00 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 47 W.The processor is attached to the BGA 1364 CPU socket. This version includes 6.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support DDR3-1866 RAM and features 3.0 PCIe Gen 16 lanes. Tjunction keeps below -- degrees C. In particular, Broadwell S Architecture is enhanced with 14 nm technology and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d. The product was launched on Q2/2015
MediaTek Helio P18
Intel Core i7-5850EQ
Compare Detail
2.00 GHz (2.00 GHz) | Frequency | 2.70 GHz |
8 | Cores | 4 |
2.00 GHz (2.00 GHz) | Turbo (1 Core) | 3.40 GHz |
-- | Turbo (All Cores) | 3.00 GHz |
No | Hyperthreading | Yes |
No | Overclocking | No |
hybrid (big.LITTLE) | Core Architecture | normal |
ARM Mali-T860 MP2 | GPU | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 |
0.80 GHz | GPU (Turbo) | 1.00 GHz |
28 nm | Technology | 14 nm |
0.80 GHz | GPU (Turbo) | 1.00 GHz |
DirectX Version | 12 | |
2 | Max. displays | 3 |
LPDDR3-933 | Memory | DDR3-1866 |
1 | Memory channels | 2 |
Max memory | ||
No | ECC | No |
-- | L2 Cache | -- |
-- | L3 Cache | 6.00 MB |
PCIe version | 3.0 | |
PCIe lanes | 16 | |
28 nm | Technology | 14 nm |
N/A | Socket | BGA 1364 |
TDP | 47 W | |
None | Virtualization | VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d |
Q1/2018 | Release date | Q2/2015 |
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-Comparison. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-Comparison’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.