| Intel Xeon W-3275 | Qualcomm Snapdragon Microsoft SQ2 | |
| 205 W | Max TDP | |
| NA | Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA |
| NA | Running cost per day | NA |
| NA | Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA |
| NA | Running cost per year | NA |
Intel Xeon W-3275 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon Microsoft SQ2
The Intel Xeon W-3275 operates with 28 cores and 56 CPU threads. It run at 4.60 GHz base 3.40 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 205 W.The processor is attached to the LGA 3647 CPU socket. This version includes 38.50 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 6 memory channels to support DDR4-2933 RAM and features 3.0 PCIe Gen 64 lanes. Tjunction keeps below -- degrees C. In particular, Cascade Lake W Architecture is enhanced with 14 nm technology and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d. The product was launched on Q2/2019
The Qualcomm Snapdragon Microsoft SQ2 operates with 8 cores and 56 CPU threads. It run at 3.15 GHz base 2.42 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at .The processor is attached to the N/A CPU socket. This version includes -- of L3 cache on one chip, supports 8 memory channels to support LPDDR4X-2133 RAM and features PCIe Gen lanes. Tjunction keeps below -- degrees C. In particular, Kryo 495 Architecture is enhanced with 7 nm technology and supports None. The product was launched on Q3/2020
Intel Xeon W-3275
Qualcomm Snapdragon Microsoft SQ2
Compare Detail
| 2.50 GHz | Frequency | 3.15 GHz |
| 28 | Cores | 8 |
| 4.60 GHz | Turbo (1 Core) | 3.15 GHz |
| 3.40 GHz | Turbo (All Cores) | 2.42 GHz |
 Yes |
Hyperthreading | No |
 No |
Overclocking | No |
| normal | Core Architecture | hybrid (big.LITTLE) |
| no iGPU | GPU | Qualcomm Adreno 690 |
| No turbo | GPU (Turbo) | No turbo |
| 14 nm | Technology | 7 nm |
| No turbo | GPU (Turbo) | No turbo |
| DirectX Version | 12.0 | |
| Max. displays | 0 | |
| DDR4-2933 | Memory | LPDDR4X-2133 |
| 6 | Memory channels | 8 |
| Max memory | ||
| Yes |
ECC | No |
| -- | L2 Cache | -- |
| 38.50 MB | L3 Cache | -- |
| 3.0 | PCIe version | |
| 64 | PCIe lanes | |
| 14 nm | Technology | 7 nm |
| LGA 3647 | Socket | N/A |
| 205 W | TDP | |
| VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d | Virtualization | None |
| Q2/2019 | Release date | Q3/2020 |
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Intel Xeon W-3275
1,114 (50%)
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Intel Xeon W-3275
28,057 (43%)
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Intel Xeon W-3275
444 (50%)
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Intel Xeon W-3275
11,026 (44%)
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Intel Xeon W-3275
1,102 (49%)
Qualcomm Snapdragon Microsoft SQ2
798 (35%)
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Intel Xeon W-3275
17,201 (35%)
Qualcomm Snapdragon Microsoft SQ2
3,054 (6%)
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-Comparison. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-Comparison’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
Intel Xeon W-3275
36,627 (34%)
Electric Usage Estimate
Electric Usage Estimate
Popular Comparision
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X vs
Intel Xeon W-3275
Intel Xeon W-3275M vs
Intel Xeon W-3275
Intel Xeon W-3175X vs
Intel Xeon W-3275
Intel Core i9-12900K vs
Intel Xeon W-3275
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX vs
Intel Xeon W-3275
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X vs
Intel Xeon W-3275
Intel Xeon W-3275 vs
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
Intel Xeon W-3275 vs
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
AMD Epyc 7742 vs
Intel Xeon W-3275
AMD Epyc 7F72 vs
Intel Xeon W-3275
Intel Xeon W-3275 vs
Intel Xeon W-3225
Intel Xeon Gold 6250L vs
Intel Xeon W-3275
Intel Pentium Gold G5400 vs
Intel Xeon W-3275
Intel Xeon W-3275 vs
Intel Core i5-6400
Intel Core i5-8210Y vs
Intel Xeon W-3275
Qualcomm Snapdragon Microsoft SQ2 vs
Intel Core i7-1065G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon Microsoft SQ2 vs
Apple M1
Qualcomm Snapdragon Microsoft SQ2 vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon Microsoft SQ1
Qualcomm Snapdragon Microsoft SQ2 vs
Intel Core i5-1030G4
Intel Core i7-1165G7 vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon Microsoft SQ2
Qualcomm Snapdragon Microsoft SQ2 vs
Intel Core i5-1130G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen. 2 vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon Microsoft SQ2
Qualcomm Snapdragon Microsoft SQ2 vs
Intel Core i5-1035G4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon Microsoft SQ2
Qualcomm Snapdragon Microsoft SQ2 vs
Intel Core i5-1135G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon Microsoft SQ2 vs
Intel Core i7-1185G7
Qualcomm Snapdragon Microsoft SQ2 vs
Apple A14 Bionic
Qualcomm Snapdragon Microsoft SQ2 vs
Intel Core i7-7500U
Qualcomm Snapdragon Microsoft SQ2 vs
Intel Core i7-10750H
Intel Core i5-10210U vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon Microsoft SQ2
Comments
