| Intel Xeon Platinum 8268 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 | |
| 205 W | Max TDP | |
| NA | Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA |
| NA | Running cost per day | NA |
| NA | Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA |
| NA | Running cost per year | NA |
Intel Xeon Platinum 8268 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
The Intel Xeon Platinum 8268 operates with 24 cores and 48 CPU threads. It run at 3.90 GHz base 3.40 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 205 W.The processor is attached to the LGA 3647 CPU socket. This version includes 35.75 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 6 memory channels to support DDR4-2933 RAM and features 3.0 PCIe Gen 48 lanes. Tjunction keeps below -- degrees C. In particular, Cascade Lake Architecture is enhanced with 14 nm technology and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d. The product was launched on Q2/2019
The Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 operates with 8 cores and 48 CPU threads. It run at 1.80 GHz base 1.80 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at .The processor is attached to the N/A CPU socket. This version includes -- of L3 cache on one chip, supports 1 memory channels to support LPDDR3-933LPDDR4X-1866 RAM and features PCIe Gen lanes. Tjunction keeps below -- degrees C. In particular, Kryo 240 Architecture is enhanced with 11 nm technology and supports None. The product was launched on Q1/2020
Intel Xeon Platinum 8268
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
Compare Detail
| 2.90 GHz | Frequency | 1.80 GHz |
| 24 | Cores | 8 |
| 3.90 GHz | Turbo (1 Core) | 1.80 GHz |
| 3.40 GHz | Turbo (All Cores) | 1.80 GHz |
 Yes |
Hyperthreading | No |
 No |
Overclocking | No |
| normal | Core Architecture | hybrid (big.LITTLE) |
| no iGPU | GPU | Qualcomm Adreno 610 |
| No turbo | GPU (Turbo) | No turbo |
| 14 nm | Technology | 11 nm |
| No turbo | GPU (Turbo) | No turbo |
| DirectX Version | 12.1 | |
| Max. displays | 0 | |
| DDR4-2933 | Memory | LPDDR3-933LPDDR4X-1866 |
| 6 | Memory channels | 1 |
| Max memory | ||
| Yes |
ECC | No |
| -- | L2 Cache | -- |
| 35.75 MB | L3 Cache | -- |
| 3.0 | PCIe version | |
| 48 | PCIe lanes | |
| 14 nm | Technology | 11 nm |
| LGA 3647 | Socket | N/A |
| 205 W | TDP | |
| VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d | Virtualization | None |
| Q2/2019 | Release date | Q1/2020 |
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Intel Xeon Platinum 8268
372 (42%)
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
252 (11%)
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
1,260 (3%)
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
274 (1%)
AnTuTu 8 benchmark
The AnTuTu 8 Benchmark measures the performance of a SoC. AnTuTu benchmarks the CPU, GPU, Memory as well as the UX (User Experience) by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu can benchmark any ARM CPU that runs under Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly compareable if the benchmark has been performed under different operating systems.
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
146,393 (20%)
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-Comparison. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-Comparison’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
Intel Xeon Platinum 8268
33,650 (31%)
Electric Usage Estimate
Electric Usage Estimate
Popular Comparision
Intel Xeon Platinum 8268 vs
Intel Xeon Platinum 8280
Intel Xeon Platinum 8268 vs
Intel Xeon Gold 6258R
Intel Xeon Platinum 8260 vs
Intel Xeon Platinum 8268
Intel Xeon Platinum 8268 vs
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
Intel Xeon Gold 6254 vs
Intel Xeon Platinum 8268
Intel Xeon Platinum 8268 vs
Intel Xeon Platinum 8276
Intel Xeon Platinum 8268 vs
AMD Epyc 7402
AMD Epyc 7F72 vs
Intel Xeon Platinum 8268
Intel Xeon Platinum 8268 vs
Intel Xeon E5-2667 v4
Intel Xeon Gold 6256 vs
Intel Xeon Platinum 8268
Intel Pentium Silver N5000 vs
Intel Xeon Platinum 8268
Intel Xeon Platinum 8268 vs
Intel Xeon Platinum 8176
Intel Core i9-9900KF vs
Intel Xeon Platinum 8268
Intel Xeon Platinum 8268 vs
Intel Xeon Silver 4209T
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300 vs
Intel Xeon Platinum 8268
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 vs
Samsung Exynos 7884
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 vs
Apple A8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 LTE vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
Samsung Exynos 850 vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
Comments
