Intel Xeon Gold 6130F | Intel Core i3-6300T | |
135 W | Max TDP | 35 W |
NA | Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA |
NA | Running cost per day | NA |
NA | Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA |
NA | Running cost per year | NA |
Intel Xeon Gold 6130F vs Intel Core i3-6300T
The Intel Xeon Gold 6130F operates with 16 cores and 32 CPU threads. It run at 3.70 GHz base 2.60 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 135 W.The processor is attached to the LGA 3647 CPU socket. This version includes 22.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 6 memory channels to support DDR4-2666 RAM and features 3.0 PCIe Gen 48 lanes. Tjunction keeps below -- degrees C. In particular, Skylake Architecture is enhanced with 14 nm technology and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d. The product was launched on Q3/2017
The Intel Core i3-6300T operates with 2 cores and 32 CPU threads. It run at No turbo base No turbo all cores while the TDP is set at 35 W.The processor is attached to the LGA 1151 CPU socket. This version includes 4.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support DDR3-1600DDR4-2133 RAM and features 3.0 PCIe Gen 16 lanes. Tjunction keeps below -- degrees C. In particular, Skylake S Architecture is enhanced with 14 nm technology and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d. The product was launched on Q3/2015
Intel Xeon Gold 6130F
Intel Core i3-6300T
Compare Detail
2.10 GHz | Frequency | 3.30 GHz |
16 | Cores | 2 |
3.70 GHz | Turbo (1 Core) | No turbo |
2.60 GHz | Turbo (All Cores) | No turbo |
Yes | Hyperthreading | Yes |
No | Overclocking | No |
normal | Core Architecture | normal |
no iGPU | GPU | Intel HD Graphics 530 |
No turbo | GPU (Turbo) | 0.95 GHz |
14 nm | Technology | 14 nm |
No turbo | GPU (Turbo) | 0.95 GHz |
DirectX Version | 12 | |
Max. displays | 3 | |
DDR4-2666 | Memory | DDR3-1600DDR4-2133 |
6 | Memory channels | 2 |
Max memory | ||
Yes | ECC | Yes |
-- | L2 Cache | -- |
22.00 MB | L3 Cache | 4.00 MB |
3.0 | PCIe version | 3.0 |
48 | PCIe lanes | 16 |
14 nm | Technology | 14 nm |
LGA 3647 | Socket | LGA 1151 |
135 W | TDP | 35 W |
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d | Virtualization | VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d |
Q3/2017 | Release date | Q3/2015 |
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-Comparison. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-Comparison’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.