Intel Xeon E7-2850 v2 | Intel Celeron N2810 | |
105 W | Max TDP | 7.5 W |
NA | Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA |
NA | Running cost per day | NA |
NA | Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA |
NA | Running cost per year | NA |
Intel Xeon E7-2850 v2 vs Intel Celeron N2810
The Intel Xeon E7-2850 v2 operates with 12 cores and 24 CPU threads. It run at 2.80 GHz base 2.80 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 105 W.The processor is attached to the LGA 2011 CPU socket. This version includes 24.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 4 memory channels to support DDR3-1600 RAM and features PCIe Gen lanes. Tjunction keeps below -- degrees C. In particular, Ivy Bridge EX Architecture is enhanced with 22 nm technology and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d. The product was launched on Q1/2014
The Intel Celeron N2810 operates with 2 cores and 24 CPU threads. It run at -- base -- all cores while the TDP is set at 7.5 W.The processor is attached to the BGA 1170 CPU socket. This version includes 1.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support DDR3L-1066 SO-DIMM RAM and features 2.0 PCIe Gen 4 lanes. Tjunction keeps below -- degrees C. In particular, Bay Trail Architecture is enhanced with 22 nm technology and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT. The product was launched on Q4/2013
Intel Xeon E7-2850 v2
Intel Celeron N2810
Compare Detail
2.30 GHz | Frequency | 2.00 GHz |
12 | Cores | 2 |
2.80 GHz | Turbo (1 Core) | -- |
2.80 GHz | Turbo (All Cores) | -- |
Yes | Hyperthreading | No |
No | Overclocking | No |
normal | Core Architecture | normal |
no iGPU | GPU | Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1) |
No turbo | GPU (Turbo) | 0.76 GHz |
22 nm | Technology | 22 nm |
No turbo | GPU (Turbo) | 0.76 GHz |
DirectX Version | 11.2 | |
Max. displays | 2 | |
DDR3-1600 | Memory | DDR3L-1066 SO-DIMM |
4 | Memory channels | 2 |
Max memory | ||
Yes | ECC | No |
-- | L2 Cache | -- |
24.00 MB | L3 Cache | 1.00 MB |
PCIe version | 2.0 | |
PCIe lanes | 4 | |
22 nm | Technology | 22 nm |
LGA 2011 | Socket | BGA 1170 |
105 W | TDP | 7.5 W |
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d | Virtualization | VT-x, VT-x EPT |
Q1/2014 | Release date | Q4/2013 |
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-Comparison. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-Comparison’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.