| Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 | Intel Atom C3958 | |
| 85 W | Max TDP | 31 W |
| NA | Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA |
| NA | Running cost per day | NA |
| NA | Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA |
| NA | Running cost per year | NA |
Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 vs Intel Atom C3958
The Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 operates with 6 cores and 6 CPU threads. It run at -- base -- all cores while the TDP is set at 85 W.The processor is attached to the LGA 2011-3 CPU socket. This version includes 15.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 4 memory channels to support DDR4-2133 RAM and features 3.0 PCIe Gen 40 lanes. Tjunction keeps below -- degrees C. In particular, Haswell E Architecture is enhanced with 22 nm technology and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d. The product was launched on Q3/2014
The Intel Atom C3958 operates with 16 cores and 6 CPU threads. It run at -- base -- all cores while the TDP is set at 31 W.The processor is attached to the BGA 1310 CPU socket. This version includes -- of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support DDR4-2400 RAM and features 3.0 PCIe Gen 16 lanes. Tjunction keeps below 100 °C degrees C. In particular, Denverton Architecture is enhanced with 14 nm technology and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d. The product was launched on Q3/2017
Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3
Intel Atom C3958
Compare Detail
| 1.90 GHz | Frequency | 2.00 GHz |
| 6 | Cores | 16 |
| -- | Turbo (1 Core) | -- |
| -- | Turbo (All Cores) | -- |
| Hyperthreading | No | |
| Overclocking | No |
|
| normal | Core Architecture | normal |
| no iGPU | GPU | no iGPU |
| No turbo | GPU (Turbo) | No turbo |
| 22 nm | Technology | 14 nm |
| No turbo | GPU (Turbo) | No turbo |
| DirectX Version | ||
| Max. displays | ||
| DDR4-2133 | Memory | DDR4-2400 |
| 4 | Memory channels | 2 |
| Max memory | ||
| ECC | Yes |
|
| -- | L2 Cache | 16.00 MB |
| 15.00 MB | L3 Cache | -- |
| 3.0 | PCIe version | 3.0 |
| 40 | PCIe lanes | 16 |
| 22 nm | Technology | 14 nm |
| LGA 2011-3 | Socket | BGA 1310 |
| 85 W | TDP | 31 W |
| VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d | Virtualization | VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d |
| Q3/2014 | Release date | Q3/2017 |
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-Comparison. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-Comparison’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
Electric Usage Estimate
