Intel Pentium g860 | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G | |
65 W | Max TDP | 65 W |
NA | Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA |
NA | Running cost per day | NA |
NA | Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA |
NA | Running cost per year | NA |
Intel Pentium g860 vs AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
The Intel Pentium g860 operates with 2 cores and 2 CPU threads. It run at No turbo base No turbo all cores while the TDP is set at 65 W.The processor is attached to the LGA 1155 CPU socket. This version includes 3.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333 RAM and features 2.0 PCIe Gen 16 lanes. Tjunction keeps below -- degrees C. In particular, Sandy Bridge Architecture is enhanced with 32 nm technology and supports None. The product was launched on Q3/2011
The AMD Ryzen 3 3200G operates with 4 cores and 2 CPU threads. It run at 4.00 GHz base 3.80 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 65 W.The processor is attached to the AM4 (LGA 1331) CPU socket. This version includes 4.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support DDR4-2933 RAM and features 3.0 PCIe Gen 12 lanes. Tjunction keeps below 95 °C degrees C. In particular, Picasso (Zen+) Architecture is enhanced with 12 nm technology and supports AMD-V, SVM. The product was launched on Q2/2019
Intel Pentium g860
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
Compare Detail
3.00 GHz | Frequency | 3.60 GHz |
2 | Cores | 4 |
No turbo | Turbo (1 Core) | 4.00 GHz |
No turbo | Turbo (All Cores) | 3.80 GHz |
No | Hyperthreading | No |
No | Overclocking | Yes |
normal | Core Architecture | normal |
Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge GT1) | GPU | AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics |
1.10 GHz | GPU (Turbo) | No turbo |
32 nm | Technology | 12 nm |
1.10 GHz | GPU (Turbo) | No turbo |
10.1 | DirectX Version | 12 |
2 | Max. displays | 3 |
DDR3-1066 DDR3-1333 |
Memory | DDR4-2933 |
2 | Memory channels | 2 |
Max memory | ||
No | ECC | Yes |
-- | L2 Cache | -- |
3.00 MB | L3 Cache | 4.00 MB |
2.0 | PCIe version | 3.0 |
16 | PCIe lanes | 12 |
32 nm | Technology | 12 nm |
LGA 1155 | Socket | AM4 (LGA 1331) |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
None | Virtualization | AMD-V, SVM |
Q3/2011 | Release date | Q2/2019 |
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-Comparison. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-Comparison’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.