GET FREE $100 Welcome Offer

BUY AND SELL BTC, BNB, CAKE, DOGE, ETH AND 27 MORE

BUY AND SELL BTC,

BNB, CAKE, DOGE

ETH AND 27 MORE

Intel Core2 Duo E8700 vs Intel Celeron G1610

Back to Homepage

Intel Core2 Duo E8700

The Intel Core2 Duo E8700 operates with 2 cores and 2 CPU threads. It run at -- base -- all cores while the TDP is set at 65 W.The processor is attached to the LGA 775 CPU socket. This version includes -- of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support DDR2-1066DDR3-1333 RAM and features PCIe Gen lanes. Tjunction keeps below -- degrees C. In particular, Wolfdale (Penryn) Architecture is enhanced with 45 nm technology and supports VT-x. The product was launched on Q1/2009

Intel Celeron G1610

The Intel Celeron G1610 operates with 2 cores and 2 CPU threads. It run at No turbo base No turbo all cores while the TDP is set at 55 W.The processor is attached to the LGA 1155 CPU socket. This version includes 2.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support DDR3-1333 RAM and features 2.0 PCIe Gen 16 lanes. Tjunction keeps below -- degrees C. In particular, Ivy Bridge S Architecture is enhanced with 22 nm technology and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d. The product was launched on Q1/2013

Intel Core2 Duo E8700

Intel Celeron G1610

Intel Core2 Duo E8700

Check price at Amazon

Check price at Ebay

Check price at AliExpress

Intel Celeron G1610

Check price at Amazon

Check price at Ebay

Check price at AliExpress

Compare Detail

3.50 GHz	Frequency	2.60 GHz
2	Cores	2
--	Turbo (1 Core)	No turbo
--	Turbo (All Cores)	No turbo
No	Hyperthreading	No
Yes	Overclocking	No
normal	Core Architecture	normal
no iGPU	GPU	Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge GT1)
No turbo	GPU (Turbo)	1.05 GHz
45 nm	Technology	22 nm
No turbo	GPU (Turbo)	1.05 GHz
	DirectX Version	11.0
	Max. displays	3
DDR2-1066DDR3-1333	Memory	DDR3-1333
2	Memory channels	2
	Max memory
No	ECC	Yes
6.00 MB	L2 Cache	--
--	L3 Cache	2.00 MB
	PCIe version	2.0
	PCIe lanes	16
45 nm	Technology	22 nm
LGA 775	Socket	LGA 1155
65 W	TDP	55 W
VT-x	Virtualization	VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
Q1/2009	Release date	Q1/2013
Show more data		Show more data

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.

Intel Core2 Duo E8700 (0%)

Intel Celeron G1610 97 (31%)

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Intel Core2 Duo E8700 (0%)

Intel Celeron G1610 175 (2%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.

Intel Core2 Duo E8700 516 (23%)

Intel Celeron G1610 496 (23%)

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Intel Core2 Duo E8700 942 (2%)

Intel Celeron G1610 919 (2%)

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.

Intel Core2 Duo E8700 (0%)

Intel Celeron G1610 102 (1%)

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.

Intel Core2 Duo E8700 (0%)

Intel Celeron G1610 2,027 (29%)

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Intel Core2 Duo E8700 (0%)

Intel Celeron G1610 3,523 (4%)

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.

Intel Core2 Duo E8700 (0%)

Intel Celeron G1610 1.02 (37%)

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Intel Core2 Duo E8700 (0%)

Intel Celeron G1610 1.93 (3%)

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)

Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The iGPU test uses the CPU internal graphic unit to execute OpenGL commands.

Intel Core2 Duo E8700 (0%)

Intel Celeron G1610 8.83 (14%)

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-Comparison. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-Comparison’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.

Intel Core2 Duo E8700 1,377 (1%)

Intel Celeron G1610 2,552 (3%)

Electric Usage Estimate

Average hours of use per day

Average CPU Utilization (0-100%)

Power cost, dollar per kWh

Electric Usage Estimate

Average hours of use per day

Average CPU Utilization (0-100%)

Power cost, dollar per kWh

Intel Core2 Duo E8700		Intel Celeron G1610
65 W	Max TDP	55 W
NA	Power consumption per day (kWh)	NA
NA	Running cost per day	NA
NA	Power consumption per year (kWh)	NA
NA	Running cost per year	NA