Intel Core2 Duo E6700 | Intel Xeon E5-2698 v4 | |
65 W | Max TDP | 135 W |
NA | Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA |
NA | Running cost per day | NA |
NA | Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA |
NA | Running cost per year | NA |
Intel Core2 Duo E6700 vs Intel Xeon E5-2698 v4
The Intel Core2 Duo E6700 operates with 2 cores and 2 CPU threads. It run at -- base -- all cores while the TDP is set at 65 W.The processor is attached to the LGA 775 CPU socket. This version includes -- of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support DDR2-1066DDR3-1333 RAM and features PCIe Gen lanes. Tjunction keeps below -- degrees C. In particular, Conroe (Core) Architecture is enhanced with 65 nm technology and supports VT-x. The product was launched on Q3/2006
The Intel Xeon E5-2698 v4 operates with 20 cores and 2 CPU threads. It run at 3.60 GHz base 2.80 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 135 W.The processor is attached to the LGA 2011-3 CPU socket. This version includes 50.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 4 memory channels to support DDR4-2400 RAM and features 3.0 PCIe Gen 40 lanes. Tjunction keeps below -- degrees C. In particular, Broadwell E Architecture is enhanced with 14 nm technology and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d. The product was launched on Q1/2016
Intel Core2 Duo E6700
Intel Xeon E5-2698 v4
Compare Detail
2.66 GHz | Frequency | 2.20 GHz |
2 | Cores | 20 |
-- | Turbo (1 Core) | 3.60 GHz |
-- | Turbo (All Cores) | 2.80 GHz |
No | Hyperthreading | Yes |
Yes | Overclocking | No |
normal | Core Architecture | normal |
no iGPU | GPU | no iGPU |
No turbo | GPU (Turbo) | No turbo |
65 nm | Technology | 14 nm |
No turbo | GPU (Turbo) | No turbo |
DirectX Version | ||
Max. displays | ||
DDR2-1066DDR3-1333 | Memory | DDR4-2400 |
2 | Memory channels | 4 |
Max memory | ||
No | ECC | Yes |
4.00 MB | L2 Cache | -- |
-- | L3 Cache | 50.00 MB |
PCIe version | 3.0 | |
PCIe lanes | 40 | |
65 nm | Technology | 14 nm |
LGA 775 | Socket | LGA 2011-3 |
65 W | TDP | 135 W |
VT-x | Virtualization | VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d |
Q3/2006 | Release date | Q1/2016 |
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-Comparison. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-Comparison’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.