Intel Core i7-12700 | Apple A14 Bionic | |
65 W | Max TDP | 7 W |
NA | Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA |
NA | Running cost per day | NA |
NA | Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA |
NA | Running cost per year | NA |
Intel Core i7-12700 vs Apple A14 Bionic
The Intel Core i7-12700 operates with 12 cores and 20 CPU threads. It run at 2.10 GHz (4.90 GHz) base 1.60 GHz (3.60 GHz) all cores while the TDP is set at 65 W.The processor is attached to the LGA 1700 CPU socket. This version includes 25.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support DDR4-3200DDR5-4800 RAM and features 5.0 PCIe Gen 20 lanes. Tjunction keeps below 100 °C degrees C. In particular, Alder Lake S Architecture is enhanced with 10 nm technology and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d. The product was launched on Q1/2022
The Apple A14 Bionic operates with 6 cores and 20 CPU threads. It run at 3.00 GHz base 1.82 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 7 W.The processor is attached to the N/A CPU socket. This version includes 16.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 1 memory channels to support LPDDR4X-4266 RAM and features PCIe Gen lanes. Tjunction keeps below -- degrees C. In particular, A14 (Firestorm/Icestorm) Architecture is enhanced with 5 nm technology and supports None. The product was launched on Q3/2020
Intel Core i7-12700
Apple A14 Bionic
Compare Detail
2.10 GHz (4.90 GHz) | Frequency | 3.00 GHz |
12 | Cores | 6 |
2.10 GHz (4.90 GHz) | Turbo (1 Core) | 3.00 GHz |
1.60 GHz (3.60 GHz) | Turbo (All Cores) | 1.82 GHz |
Yes | Hyperthreading | No |
No | Overclocking | No |
hybrid (big.LITTLE) | Core Architecture | hybrid (big.LITTLE) |
Intel UHD Graphics 770 | GPU | Apple A14 |
1.50 GHz | GPU (Turbo) | No turbo |
10 nm | Technology | 5 nm |
1.50 GHz | GPU (Turbo) | No turbo |
12 | DirectX Version | |
3 | Max. displays | 3 |
DDR4-3200DDR5-4800 | Memory | LPDDR4X-4266 |
2 | Memory channels | 1 |
Max memory | ||
Yes | ECC | No |
12.00 MB | L2 Cache | 12.00 MB |
25.00 MB | L3 Cache | 16.00 MB |
5.0 | PCIe version | |
20 | PCIe lanes | |
10 nm | Technology | 5 nm |
LGA 1700 | Socket | N/A |
65 W | TDP | 7 W |
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d | Virtualization | None |
Q1/2022 | Release date | Q3/2020 |
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
AnTuTu 8 benchmark
The AnTuTu 8 Benchmark measures the performance of a SoC. AnTuTu benchmarks the CPU, GPU, Memory as well as the UX (User Experience) by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu can benchmark any ARM CPU that runs under Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly compareable if the benchmark has been performed under different operating systems.
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-Comparison. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-Comparison’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.