Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300 | Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M | |
95 W | Max TDP | 165 W |
NA | Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA |
NA | Running cost per day | NA |
NA | Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA |
NA | Running cost per year | NA |
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300 vs Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M
The Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300 operates with 4 cores and 4 CPU threads. It run at -- base -- all cores while the TDP is set at 95 W.The processor is attached to the LGA 775 CPU socket. This version includes -- of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support DDR2-800DDR3-1066 RAM and features PCIe Gen lanes. Tjunction keeps below -- degrees C. In particular, Yorkfield (Penryn) Architecture is enhanced with 45 nm technology and supports VT-x, VT-d. The product was launched on Q1/2008
The Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M operates with 24 cores and 4 CPU threads. It run at 3.90 GHz base 2.40 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 165 W.The processor is attached to the LGA 3647 CPU socket. This version includes 35.75 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 6 memory channels to support DDR4-2933 RAM and features 3.0 PCIe Gen 48 lanes. Tjunction keeps below -- degrees C. In particular, Cascade Lake Architecture is enhanced with 14 nm technology and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d. The product was launched on Q2/2019
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300
Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M
Compare Detail
2.50 GHz | Frequency | 2.40 GHz |
4 | Cores | 24 |
-- | Turbo (1 Core) | 3.90 GHz |
-- | Turbo (All Cores) | 2.40 GHz |
No | Hyperthreading | Yes |
No | Overclocking | No |
normal | Core Architecture | normal |
no iGPU | GPU | no iGPU |
No turbo | GPU (Turbo) | No turbo |
45 nm | Technology | 14 nm |
No turbo | GPU (Turbo) | No turbo |
DirectX Version | ||
Max. displays | ||
DDR2-800DDR3-1066 | Memory | DDR4-2933 |
2 | Memory channels | 6 |
Max memory | ||
No | ECC | Yes |
6.00 MB | L2 Cache | -- |
-- | L3 Cache | 35.75 MB |
PCIe version | 3.0 | |
PCIe lanes | 48 | |
45 nm | Technology | 14 nm |
LGA 775 | Socket | LGA 3647 |
95 W | TDP | 165 W |
VT-x, VT-d | Virtualization | VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d |
Q1/2008 | Release date | Q2/2019 |
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-Comparison. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-Comparison’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.