Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300 | Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9775 | |
95 W | Max TDP | 150 W |
NA | Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA |
NA | Running cost per day | NA |
NA | Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA |
NA | Running cost per year | NA |
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300 vs Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9775
The Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300 operates with 4 cores and 4 CPU threads. It run at -- base -- all cores while the TDP is set at 95 W.The processor is attached to the LGA 775 CPU socket. This version includes -- of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support DDR2-800DDR3-1066 RAM and features PCIe Gen lanes. Tjunction keeps below -- degrees C. In particular, Yorkfield (Penryn) Architecture is enhanced with 45 nm technology and supports VT-x, VT-d. The product was launched on Q1/2008
The Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9775 operates with 4 cores and 4 CPU threads. It run at -- base -- all cores while the TDP is set at 150 W.The processor is attached to the LGA 775 CPU socket. This version includes -- of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support DDR2-800DDR3-1066 RAM and features PCIe Gen lanes. Tjunction keeps below -- degrees C. In particular, Yorkfield (Penryn) Architecture is enhanced with 45 nm technology and supports VT-x, VT-d. The product was launched on Q1/2008
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300
Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9775
Compare Detail
2.50 GHz | Frequency | 3.20 GHz |
4 | Cores | 4 |
-- | Turbo (1 Core) | -- |
-- | Turbo (All Cores) | -- |
No | Hyperthreading | No |
No | Overclocking | Yes |
normal | Core Architecture | normal |
no iGPU | GPU | no iGPU |
No turbo | GPU (Turbo) | No turbo |
45 nm | Technology | 45 nm |
No turbo | GPU (Turbo) | No turbo |
DirectX Version | ||
Max. displays | ||
DDR2-800DDR3-1066 | Memory | DDR2-800DDR3-1066 |
2 | Memory channels | 2 |
Max memory | ||
No | ECC | No |
6.00 MB | L2 Cache | 12.00 MB |
-- | L3 Cache | -- |
PCIe version | ||
PCIe lanes | ||
45 nm | Technology | 45 nm |
LGA 775 | Socket | LGA 775 |
95 W | TDP | 150 W |
VT-x, VT-d | Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d |
Q1/2008 | Release date | Q1/2008 |
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-Comparison. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-Comparison’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.