GET FREE $100 Welcome Offer
BUY AND SELL BTC, BNB, CAKE, DOGE, ETH AND 27 MORE
BUY AND SELL BTC,
BNB, CAKE, DOGE
ETH AND 27 MORE

Intel Celeron J1900 vs Intel Xeon Platinum 8352Y

Intel Celeron J1900

The Intel Celeron J1900 operates with 4 cores and 4 CPU threads. It run at 2.42 GHz base 2.42 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 10 W.The processor is attached to the BGA 1170 CPU socket. This version includes 2.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support RAM and features 2.0 PCIe Gen 4 lanes. Tjunction keeps below -- degrees C. In particular, Bay Trail Architecture is enhanced with 22 nm technology and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT. The product was launched on Q4/2013

Intel Celeron J1900

The Intel Xeon Platinum 8352Y operates with 32 cores and 4 CPU threads. It run at 3.40 GHz base 2.60 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 205 W.The processor is attached to the LGA 4189 CPU socket. This version includes 48.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 8 memory channels to support DDR4-3200 RAM and features 4.0 PCIe Gen 64 lanes. Tjunction keeps below -- degrees C. In particular, Ice Lake Architecture is enhanced with 10 nm technology and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d. The product was launched on Q2/2021


Compare Detail

2.00 GHz Frequency 2.20 GHz
4 Cores 32
2.42 GHz Turbo (1 Core) 3.40 GHz
2.42 GHz Turbo (All Cores) 2.60 GHz
uncheck No Hyperthreading Yes check
uncheck No Overclocking No uncheck
normal Core Architecture normal
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1) GPU no iGPU
0.85 GHz GPU (Turbo) No turbo
22 nm Technology 10 nm
0.85 GHz GPU (Turbo) No turbo
11.2 DirectX Version
2 Max. displays
Memory DDR4-3200
2 Memory channels 8
Max memory
uncheck No ECC Yes check
-- L2 Cache --
2.00 MB L3 Cache 48.00 MB
2.0 PCIe version 4.0
4 PCIe lanes 64
22 nm Technology 10 nm
BGA 1170 Socket LGA 4189
10 W TDP 205 W
VT-x, VT-x EPT Virtualization VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
Q4/2013 Release date Q2/2021

Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.

8% Complete
0% Complete

Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

1% Complete
0% Complete

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.

12% Complete
0% Complete

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

1% Complete
0% Complete

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.

10% Complete
0% Complete

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

1% Complete
0% Complete

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.

0% Complete
0% Complete

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.

14% Complete
0% Complete

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Intel Celeron J1900 3,181 (3%)
3% Complete
0% Complete

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.

Intel Celeron J1900 0.48 (13%)
13% Complete
0% Complete

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

3% Complete
0% Complete

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)

Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The iGPU test uses the CPU internal graphic unit to execute OpenGL commands.

Intel Celeron J1900 7.73 (12%)
12% Complete
0% Complete

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-Comparison. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-Comparison’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.

Intel Celeron J1900 1,140 (1%)
1% Complete
0% Complete
Electric Usage Estimate

Electric Usage Estimate

Electric Usage Estimate

Electric Usage Estimate

Intel Celeron J1900 Intel Xeon Platinum 8352Y
10 W Max TDP 205 W
NA Power consumption per day (kWh) NA
NA Running cost per day NA
NA Power consumption per year (kWh) NA
NA Running cost per year NA

Comments

back to top