| Intel Celeron G3900 | Intel Xeon Gold 6148F | |
| 51 W | Max TDP | 160 W |
| NA | Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA |
| NA | Running cost per day | NA |
| NA | Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA |
| NA | Running cost per year | NA |
Intel Celeron G3900 vs Intel Xeon Gold 6148F
The Intel Celeron G3900 operates with 2 cores and 2 CPU threads. It run at -- base -- all cores while the TDP is set at 51 W.The processor is attached to the LGA 1151 CPU socket. This version includes 2.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support DDR4-2133 RAM and features 3.0 PCIe Gen 16 lanes. Tjunction keeps below -- degrees C. In particular, Skylake S Architecture is enhanced with 14 nm technology and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d. The product was launched on Q1/2016
The Intel Xeon Gold 6148F operates with 20 cores and 2 CPU threads. It run at 3.70 GHz base 3.00 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 160 W.The processor is attached to the LGA 3647 CPU socket. This version includes 28.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 6 memory channels to support DDR4-2666 RAM and features 3.0 PCIe Gen 48 lanes. Tjunction keeps below -- degrees C. In particular, Skylake Architecture is enhanced with 14 nm technology and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d. The product was launched on Q3/2017
Intel Celeron G3900
Intel Xeon Gold 6148F
Compare Detail
| 2.80 GHz | Frequency | 2.40 GHz |
| 2 | Cores | 20 |
| -- | Turbo (1 Core) | 3.70 GHz |
| -- | Turbo (All Cores) | 3.00 GHz |
 No |
Hyperthreading | Yes  |
| No |
Overclocking | No |
| normal | Core Architecture | normal |
| Intel HD Graphics 510 | GPU | no iGPU |
| 0.95 GHz | GPU (Turbo) | No turbo |
| 14 nm | Technology | 14 nm |
| 0.95 GHz | GPU (Turbo) | No turbo |
| 12.0 | DirectX Version | |
| 3 | Max. displays | |
| DDR4-2133 | Memory | DDR4-2666 |
| 2 | Memory channels | 6 |
| Max memory | ||
| Yes |
ECC | Yes |
| -- | L2 Cache | -- |
| 2.00 MB | L3 Cache | 28.00 MB |
| 3.0 | PCIe version | 3.0 |
| 16 | PCIe lanes | 48 |
| 14 nm | Technology | 14 nm |
| LGA 1151 | Socket | LGA 3647 |
| 51 W | TDP | 160 W |
| VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d | Virtualization | VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d |
| Q1/2016 | Release date | Q3/2017 |
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Intel Celeron G3900
1,026 (46%)
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Intel Celeron G3900
2,012 (3%)
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Intel Celeron G3900
124 (36%)
Intel Xeon Gold 6148F
168 (55%)
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Intel Celeron G3900
214 (2%)
Intel Xeon Gold 6148F
3,315 (31%)
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Intel Celeron G3900
687 (30%)
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Intel Celeron G3900
1,254 (3%)
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
Intel Celeron G3900
183 (1%)
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Intel Celeron G3900
2,764 (40%)
Intel Xeon Gold 6148F
4,141 (60%)
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Intel Celeron G3900
4,876 (5%)
Intel Xeon Gold 6148F
62,181 (65%)
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Intel Celeron G3900
1.40 (38%)
Intel Xeon Gold 6148F
1.99 (73%)
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Intel Celeron G3900
2.65 (5%)
Intel Xeon Gold 6148F
36.46 (66%)
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The iGPU test uses the CPU internal graphic unit to execute OpenGL commands.
Intel Celeron G3900
17.34 (28%)
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-Comparison. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-Comparison’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
Intel Celeron G3900
3,235 (3%)
Electric Usage Estimate
Electric Usage Estimate
Popular Comparision
Intel Celeron G3900 vs
Intel Pentium G4400
Intel Celeron G3900 vs
Intel Celeron G1840
Intel Celeron G3900 vs
Intel Celeron G3930
Intel Celeron G3900 vs
Intel Core i3-6100
Intel Celeron J3455 vs
Intel Celeron G3900
Intel Celeron G3900 vs
Intel Pentium G4500
Intel Celeron G3900 vs
Intel Celeron N3150
Intel Pentium J4205 vs
Intel Celeron G3900
Intel Celeron G3900 vs
Intel Pentium N3700
Intel Celeron G1820 vs
Intel Celeron G3900
Intel Celeron G3900 vs
AMD A4-6300
Intel Celeron G3900 vs
Intel Celeron J1900
Intel Celeron G3900 vs
AMD Athlon 5350
Intel Celeron G3900 vs
Intel Celeron G4900
Intel Celeron G3900 vs
Intel Celeron G3900T
Intel Xeon Gold 6148F vs
Intel Xeon Platinum 8170
Intel Xeon Gold 6148F vs
Intel Core i9-7960X
Intel Xeon Gold 6148F vs
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
AMD E2-6110 vs
Intel Xeon Gold 6148F
Intel Core i3-5005U vs
Intel Xeon Gold 6148F
Intel Celeron G3900 vs
Intel Xeon Gold 6148F
Intel Xeon Gold 6148F vs
Intel Celeron 1007U
Intel Xeon Gold 6148F vs
AMD A10-4655M
Intel Xeon Gold 6148F vs
AMD A4-5000
Intel Core i3-3250 vs
Intel Xeon Gold 6148F
Intel Xeon Gold 6148F vs
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X
Intel Xeon Platinum 8176 vs
Intel Xeon Gold 6148F
Intel Xeon Gold 6148F vs
Intel Xeon Platinum 8164
Intel Core i5-4340M vs
Intel Xeon Gold 6148F
Intel Xeon Gold 6148F vs
Intel Core i5-5250U
AMD Epyc 7232P vs
Intel Xeon Gold 6148F
Intel Xeon Gold 6148F vs
AMD A8-3850
Intel Core i5-9600K vs
Intel Xeon Gold 6148F
Intel Core i5-6600 vs
Intel Xeon Gold 6148F
Intel Core i5-2500k vs
Intel Xeon Gold 6148F
Intel Core i7-4770K vs
Intel Xeon Gold 6148F
Intel Xeon Gold 6148 vs
Intel Xeon Gold 6148F
Intel Xeon Gold 6148F vs
Intel Core i5-6500
Intel Xeon Gold 6148F vs
Intel Core i7-4702MQ
Intel Xeon E5-2697A v4 vs
Intel Xeon Gold 6148F
Comments
