Intel Celeron 3865U | Intel Xeon D-1623N | |
15 W | Max TDP | 35 W |
NA | Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA |
NA | Running cost per day | NA |
NA | Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA |
NA | Running cost per year | NA |
Intel Celeron 3865U vs Intel Xeon D-1623N
The Intel Celeron 3865U operates with 2 cores and 2 CPU threads. It run at -- base -- all cores while the TDP is set at 15 W.The processor is attached to the BGA 1356 CPU socket. This version includes 2.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support DDR3L-1600 SO-DIMMDDR4-2133LPDDR3-1866 RAM and features 2.0 PCIe Gen 10 lanes. Tjunction keeps below 100 °C degrees C. In particular, Kaby Lake U Architecture is enhanced with 14 nm technology and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d. The product was launched on Q1/2017
The Intel Xeon D-1623N operates with 4 cores and 2 CPU threads. It run at 3.20 GHz base 2.80 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 35 W.The processor is attached to the BGA 1667 CPU socket. This version includes -- of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support DDR4-1866 RAM and features PCIe Gen lanes. Tjunction keeps below -- degrees C. In particular, Hewitt Lake Architecture is enhanced with 14 nm technology and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d. The product was launched on Q2/2019
Intel Celeron 3865U
Intel Xeon D-1623N
Compare Detail
1.80 GHz | Frequency | 2.40 GHz |
2 | Cores | 4 |
-- | Turbo (1 Core) | 3.20 GHz |
-- | Turbo (All Cores) | 2.80 GHz |
No | Hyperthreading | Yes |
No | Overclocking | No |
normal | Core Architecture | normal |
Intel HD Graphics 610 | GPU | no iGPU |
0.90 GHz | GPU (Turbo) | No turbo |
14 nm | Technology | 14 nm |
0.90 GHz | GPU (Turbo) | No turbo |
12 | DirectX Version | |
3 | Max. displays | |
DDR3L-1600 SO-DIMMDDR4-2133LPDDR3-1866 | Memory | DDR4-1866 |
2 | Memory channels | 2 |
Max memory | ||
No | ECC | Yes |
-- | L2 Cache | 6.00 MB |
2.00 MB | L3 Cache | -- |
2.0 | PCIe version | |
10 | PCIe lanes | |
14 nm | Technology | 14 nm |
BGA 1356 | Socket | BGA 1667 |
15 W | TDP | 35 W |
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d | Virtualization | VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d |
Q1/2017 | Release date | Q2/2019 |
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-Comparison. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-Comparison’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.