GET FREE $100 Welcome Offer
BUY AND SELL BTC, BNB, CAKE, DOGE, ETH AND 27 MORE
BUY AND SELL BTC,
BNB, CAKE, DOGE
ETH AND 27 MORE

Intel Atom N2600 vs Intel Core i5-3340S

Intel Atom N2600

The Intel Atom N2600 operates with 2 cores and 4 CPU threads. It run at -- base -- all cores while the TDP is set at 3.5 W.The processor is attached to the BGA 559 CPU socket. This version includes 1.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 1 memory channels to support DDR3-1066 RAM and features PCIe Gen lanes. Tjunction keeps below -- degrees C. In particular, Cedarview Architecture is enhanced with 32 nm technology and supports None. The product was launched on Q4/2011

Intel Atom N2600

The Intel Core i5-3340S operates with 4 cores and 4 CPU threads. It run at 3.30 GHz base -- all cores while the TDP is set at 65 W.The processor is attached to the LGA 1155 CPU socket. This version includes 6.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support DDR3-1333DDR3-1600 RAM and features 3.0 PCIe Gen 16 lanes. Tjunction keeps below -- degrees C. In particular, Ivy Bridge S Architecture is enhanced with 22 nm technology and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d. The product was launched on Q3/2013


Compare Detail

1.60 GHz Frequency 2.80 GHz
2 Cores 4
-- Turbo (1 Core) 3.30 GHz
-- Turbo (All Cores) --
check Yes Hyperthreading No
uncheck No Overclocking No uncheck
normal Core Architecture normal
Intel GMA 3600 GPU Intel HD Graphics 2500
No turbo GPU (Turbo) 1.05 GHz
32 nm Technology 22 nm
No turbo GPU (Turbo) 1.05 GHz
10.1 DirectX Version 11.0
2 Max. displays 3
DDR3-1066 Memory DDR3-1333DDR3-1600
1 Memory channels 2
Max memory
uncheck No ECC No uncheck
-- L2 Cache --
1.00 MB L3 Cache 6.00 MB
PCIe version 3.0
PCIe lanes 16
32 nm Technology 22 nm
BGA 559 Socket LGA 1155
3.5 W TDP 65 W
None Virtualization VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
Q4/2011 Release date Q3/2013

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.

0% Complete
0% Complete

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.

Intel Atom N2600 387 (6%)
6% Complete
0% Complete

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Intel Atom N2600 973 (1%)
1% Complete
0% Complete

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.

Intel Atom N2600 0.20 (5%)
5% Complete
0% Complete

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Intel Atom N2600 0.48 (1%)
1% Complete
0% Complete

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-Comparison. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-Comparison’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.

Intel Atom N2600 532 (0%)
0% Complete
0% Complete
Electric Usage Estimate

Electric Usage Estimate

Electric Usage Estimate

Electric Usage Estimate

Intel Atom N2600 Intel Core i5-3340S
3.5 W Max TDP 65 W
NA Power consumption per day (kWh) NA
NA Running cost per day NA
NA Power consumption per year (kWh) NA
NA Running cost per year NA

Comments

back to top