GET FREE $100 Welcome Offer
BUY AND SELL BTC, BNB, CAKE, DOGE, ETH AND 27 MORE
BUY AND SELL BTC,
BNB, CAKE, DOGE
ETH AND 27 MORE

Intel Atom E3827 vs Intel Celeron N2940

Intel Atom E3827

The Intel Atom E3827 operates with 2 cores and 2 CPU threads. It run at -- base -- all cores while the TDP is set at 8 W.The processor is attached to the BGA 1170 CPU socket. This version includes 1.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 1 memory channels to support DDR3L-1333 SO-DIMM RAM and features PCIe Gen lanes. Tjunction keeps below -- degrees C. In particular, Bay Trail Architecture is enhanced with 22 nm technology and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT. The product was launched on Q4/2013

Intel Atom E3827

The Intel Celeron N2940 operates with 4 cores and 2 CPU threads. It run at 2.25 GHz base 2.25 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 7.5 W.The processor is attached to the BGA 1170 CPU socket. This version includes 2.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support DDR3L-1333 SO-DIMM RAM and features 2.0 PCIe Gen 4 lanes. Tjunction keeps below -- degrees C. In particular, Bay Trail Architecture is enhanced with 22 nm technology and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT. The product was launched on Q2/2014


Compare Detail

1.75 GHz Frequency 1.83 GHz
2 Cores 4
-- Turbo (1 Core) 2.25 GHz
-- Turbo (All Cores) 2.25 GHz
uncheck No Hyperthreading No
uncheck No Overclocking No uncheck
normal Core Architecture normal
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1) GPU Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1)
0.79 GHz GPU (Turbo) 0.85 GHz
22 nm Technology 22 nm
0.79 GHz GPU (Turbo) 0.85 GHz
11.2 DirectX Version 11.2
2 Max. displays 2
DDR3L-1333 SO-DIMM Memory DDR3L-1333 SO-DIMM
1 Memory channels 2
Max memory
uncheck No ECC No uncheck
-- L2 Cache --
1.00 MB L3 Cache 2.00 MB
PCIe version 2.0
PCIe lanes 4
22 nm Technology 22 nm
BGA 1170 Socket BGA 1170
8 W TDP 7.5 W
VT-x, VT-x EPT Virtualization VT-x, VT-x EPT
Q4/2013 Release date Q2/2014

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.

0% Complete
13% Complete

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

0% Complete
1% Complete

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.

0% Complete
1% Complete

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.

Intel Atom E3827 813 (12%)
12% Complete
14% Complete

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Intel Atom E3827 1,476 (2%)
2% Complete
Intel Celeron N2940 3,055 (3%)
3% Complete

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.

0% Complete
Intel Celeron N2940 0.46 (16%)
16% Complete

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

0% Complete
3% Complete

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)

Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The iGPU test uses the CPU internal graphic unit to execute OpenGL commands.

0% Complete
Intel Celeron N2940 10.33 (17%)
17% Complete

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-Comparison. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-Comparison’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.

Intel Atom E3827 850 (1%)
1% Complete
Intel Celeron N2940 1,845 (2%)
2% Complete
Electric Usage Estimate

Electric Usage Estimate

Electric Usage Estimate

Electric Usage Estimate

Intel Atom E3827 Intel Celeron N2940
8 W Max TDP 7.5 W
NA Power consumption per day (kWh) NA
NA Running cost per day NA
NA Power consumption per year (kWh) NA
NA Running cost per year NA

Popular Comparision

Intel Atom E3827 Intel Atom E3845
Intel Atom E3827 vs Intel Atom E3845
Intel Atom E3815 Intel Atom E3827
Intel Atom E3815 vs Intel Atom E3827
Intel Atom E3827 Intel Atom E3825
Intel Atom E3827 vs Intel Atom E3825
Intel Core i7-3517U Intel Atom E3827
Intel Core i7-3517U vs Intel Atom E3827
AMD A4-1250 Intel Atom E3827
AMD A4-1250 vs Intel Atom E3827
Intel Celeron 3755U Intel Atom E3827
Intel Celeron 3755U vs Intel Atom E3827
Intel Atom E3827 Intel Celeron N2940
Intel Atom E3827 vs Intel Celeron N2940
AMD Phenom II X3 B77 Intel Atom E3827
AMD Phenom II X3 B77 vs Intel Atom E3827
Intel Core i7-2600K Intel Atom E3827
Intel Core i7-2600K vs Intel Atom E3827
Intel Core i3-3210 Intel Atom E3827
Intel Core i3-3210 vs Intel Atom E3827
Intel Atom E3827 Intel Atom C2350
Intel Atom E3827 vs Intel Atom C2350
Intel Core i7-4770K Intel Atom E3827
Intel Core i7-4770K vs Intel Atom E3827
Intel Atom E3827 Intel Xeon Gold 6150
Intel Atom E3827 vs Intel Xeon Gold 6150
Intel Atom E3827 AMD A10-7300
Intel Atom E3827 vs AMD A10-7300
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 Intel Atom E3827
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 vs Intel Atom E3827
Intel Core i5-4200U Intel Celeron N2940
Intel Core i5-4200U vs Intel Celeron N2940
Intel Celeron N2840 Intel Celeron N2940
Intel Celeron N2840 vs Intel Celeron N2940
Intel Celeron N2940 Intel Pentium N3540
Intel Celeron N2940 vs Intel Pentium N3540
Intel Core i3-4030U Intel Celeron N2940
Intel Core i3-4030U vs Intel Celeron N2940
Intel Celeron N3150 Intel Celeron N2940
Intel Celeron N3150 vs Intel Celeron N2940
Intel Atom Z3735F Intel Celeron N2940
Intel Atom Z3735F vs Intel Celeron N2940
Intel Celeron N2940 Intel Celeron J1900
Intel Celeron N2940 vs Intel Celeron J1900
Intel Celeron N2940 Intel Celeron N3350
Intel Celeron N2940 vs Intel Celeron N3350
Intel Celeron N2930 Intel Celeron N2940
Intel Celeron N2930 vs Intel Celeron N2940
Intel Celeron N2940 Intel Core M-5Y10
Intel Celeron N2940 vs Intel Core M-5Y10
Intel Celeron N2940 AMD A8-6410
Intel Celeron N2940 vs AMD A8-6410
Intel Celeron N2940 Intel Core i3-4005U
Intel Celeron N2940 vs Intel Core i3-4005U
Intel Celeron N2940 Intel Celeron N3160
Intel Celeron N2940 vs Intel Celeron N3160
Intel Celeron N2940 AMD A6-6310
Intel Celeron N2940 vs AMD A6-6310
Intel Celeron N2940 Intel Pentium N3520
Intel Celeron N2940 vs Intel Pentium N3520
Intel Core i5-4210U Intel Celeron N2940
Intel Core i5-4210U vs Intel Celeron N2940
Intel Celeron N2940 Intel Celeron N2920
Intel Celeron N2940 vs Intel Celeron N2920
Intel Celeron 3205U Intel Celeron N2940
Intel Celeron 3205U vs Intel Celeron N2940
Intel Celeron N2940 AMD E1-6010
Intel Celeron N2940 vs AMD E1-6010
Intel Celeron N2940 Intel Celeron N2830
Intel Celeron N2940 vs Intel Celeron N2830
Intel Pentium N3530 Intel Celeron N2940
Intel Pentium N3530 vs Intel Celeron N2940
Intel Core2 Duo E6700 Intel Celeron N2940
Intel Core2 Duo E6700 vs Intel Celeron N2940
Intel Celeron N2940 AMD C-60
Intel Celeron N2940 vs AMD C-60
Intel Celeron N2940 AMD E1-2100
Intel Celeron N2940 vs AMD E1-2100
Intel Celeron N2940 AMD E2-6110
Intel Celeron N2940 vs AMD E2-6110

Comments

back to top