AMD Ryzen Embedded R1600 | Intel Celeron N5105 | |
15 W | Max TDP | 10 W |
NA | Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA |
NA | Running cost per day | NA |
NA | Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA |
NA | Running cost per year | NA |
AMD Ryzen Embedded R1600 vs Intel Celeron N5105
The AMD Ryzen Embedded R1600 operates with 2 cores and 4 CPU threads. It run at 3.10 GHz base -- all cores while the TDP is set at 15 W.The processor is attached to the FP5 CPU socket. This version includes 4.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support DDR4-2400 RAM and features PCIe Gen lanes. Tjunction keeps below 105 °C degrees C. In particular, Banded Kestrel (Zen) Architecture is enhanced with 14 nm technology and supports AMD-V, SVM. The product was launched on Q2/2019
The Intel Celeron N5105 operates with 4 cores and 4 CPU threads. It run at 2.90 GHz base 2.60 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 10 W.The processor is attached to the BGA 1338 CPU socket. This version includes 4.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support DDR4-2933 RAM and features 3.0 PCIe Gen 8 lanes. Tjunction keeps below 105 °C degrees C. In particular, Jasper Lake Architecture is enhanced with 10 nm technology and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d. The product was launched on Q1/2021
AMD Ryzen Embedded R1600
Intel Celeron N5105
Compare Detail
2.60 GHz | Frequency | 2.00 GHz |
2 | Cores | 4 |
3.10 GHz | Turbo (1 Core) | 2.90 GHz |
-- | Turbo (All Cores) | 2.60 GHz |
Yes | Hyperthreading | No |
No | Overclocking | No |
normal | Core Architecture | normal |
no iGPU | GPU | Intel UHD Graphics 24 EUs (Jasper Lake) |
No turbo | GPU (Turbo) | 0.90 GHz |
14 nm | Technology | 10 nm |
No turbo | GPU (Turbo) | 0.90 GHz |
DirectX Version | 12 | |
Max. displays | 3 | |
DDR4-2400 | Memory | DDR4-2933 |
2 | Memory channels | 2 |
Max memory | ||
Yes | ECC | No |
1.00 MB | L2 Cache | 1.50 MB |
4.00 MB | L3 Cache | 4.00 MB |
PCIe version | 3.0 | |
PCIe lanes | 8 | |
14 nm | Technology | 10 nm |
FP5 | Socket | BGA 1338 |
15 W | TDP | 10 W |
AMD-V, SVM | Virtualization | VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d |
Q2/2019 | Release date | Q1/2021 |
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-Comparison. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-Comparison’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.