AMD Ryzen 7 2700E | AMD RX-216GD | |
45 W | Max TDP | 15 W |
NA | Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA |
NA | Running cost per day | NA |
NA | Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA |
NA | Running cost per year | NA |
AMD Ryzen 7 2700E vs AMD RX-216GD
The AMD Ryzen 7 2700E operates with 8 cores and 16 CPU threads. It run at 4.00 GHz base 3.20 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 45 W.The processor is attached to the AM4 (LGA 1331) CPU socket. This version includes 16.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support DDR4-2666 RAM and features 3.0 PCIe Gen 20 lanes. Tjunction keeps below -- degrees C. In particular, Pinnacle Ridge (Zen+) Architecture is enhanced with 12 nm technology and supports AMD-V, SVM. The product was launched on Q3/2018
The AMD RX-216GD operates with 2 cores and 16 CPU threads. It run at 3.00 GHz base -- all cores while the TDP is set at 15 W.The processor is attached to the FP4 CPU socket. This version includes -- of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support DDR3-1600DDR4-1600 RAM and features PCIe Gen lanes. Tjunction keeps below 90 °C degrees C. In particular, Merlin Falcon (Excavator) Architecture is enhanced with 28 nm technology and supports AMD-V, AMD-Vt. The product was launched on Q4/2015
AMD Ryzen 7 2700E
Compare Detail
2.80 GHz | Frequency | 1.60 GHz |
8 | Cores | 2 |
4.00 GHz | Turbo (1 Core) | 3.00 GHz |
3.20 GHz | Turbo (All Cores) | -- |
Yes | Hyperthreading | No |
Yes | Overclocking | No |
normal | Core Architecture | normal |
no iGPU | GPU | AMD Radeon R5 - 256 (Merlin Falcon) |
No turbo | GPU (Turbo) | No turbo |
12 nm | Technology | 28 nm |
No turbo | GPU (Turbo) | No turbo |
DirectX Version | ||
Max. displays | 3 | |
DDR4-2666 | Memory | DDR3-1600DDR4-1600 |
2 | Memory channels | 2 |
Max memory | ||
Yes | ECC | Yes |
-- | L2 Cache | 1.00 MB |
16.00 MB | L3 Cache | -- |
3.0 | PCIe version | |
20 | PCIe lanes | |
12 nm | Technology | 28 nm |
AM4 (LGA 1331) | Socket | FP4 |
45 W | TDP | 15 W |
AMD-V, SVM | Virtualization | AMD-V, AMD-Vt |
Q3/2018 | Release date | Q4/2015 |
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-Comparison. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-Comparison’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.