| AMD FX-8350 | AMD Epyc 7532 | |
| 125 W | Max TDP | 200 W |
| NA | Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA |
| NA | Running cost per day | NA |
| NA | Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA |
| NA | Running cost per year | NA |
AMD FX-8350 vs AMD Epyc 7532
The AMD FX-8350 operates with 8 cores and 8 CPU threads. It run at 4.20 GHz base 4.10 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 125 W.The processor is attached to the AM3+ CPU socket. This version includes 8.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support RAM and features PCIe Gen lanes. Tjunction keeps below -- degrees C. In particular, Vishera (Bulldozer) Architecture is enhanced with 32 nm technology and supports AMD-V. The product was launched on Q4/2012
The AMD Epyc 7532 operates with 32 cores and 8 CPU threads. It run at 3.30 GHz base 2.90 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 200 W.The processor is attached to the SP3 CPU socket. This version includes 256.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 8 memory channels to support DDR4-3200 RAM and features 4.0 PCIe Gen 128 lanes. Tjunction keeps below -- degrees C. In particular, Rome (Zen 2) Architecture is enhanced with 7 nm technology and supports AMD-V, SVM. The product was launched on Q1/2020
Compare Detail
| 4.00 GHz | Frequency | 2.40 GHz |
| 8 | Cores | 32 |
| 4.20 GHz | Turbo (1 Core) | 3.30 GHz |
| 4.10 GHz | Turbo (All Cores) | 2.90 GHz |
 No |
Hyperthreading | Yes  |
| Yes |
Overclocking | No |
| normal | Core Architecture | normal |
| no iGPU | GPU | no iGPU |
| No turbo | GPU (Turbo) | No turbo |
| 32 nm | Technology | 7 nm |
| No turbo | GPU (Turbo) | No turbo |
| DirectX Version | ||
| Max. displays | ||
| Memory | DDR4-3200 | |
| 2 | Memory channels | 8 |
| Max memory | ||
| Yes |
ECC | Yes |
| -- | L2 Cache | -- |
| 8.00 MB | L3 Cache | 256.00 MB |
| PCIe version | 4.0 | |
| PCIe lanes | 128 | |
| 32 nm | Technology | 7 nm |
| AM3+ | Socket | SP3 |
| 125 W | TDP | 200 W |
| AMD-V | Virtualization | AMD-V, SVM |
| Q4/2012 | Release date | Q1/2020 |
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
AMD FX-8350
583 (26%)
AMD Epyc 7532
(0%)
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
AMD FX-8350
3,804 (6%)
AMD Epyc 7532
(0%)
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
AMD FX-8350
213 (24%)
AMD Epyc 7532
392 (44%)
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
AMD FX-8350
1,299 (5%)
AMD Epyc 7532
(0%)
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
AMD FX-8350
100 (29%)
AMD Epyc 7532
(0%)
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
AMD FX-8350
666 (6%)
AMD Epyc 7532
(0%)
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
AMD FX-8350
577 (26%)
AMD Epyc 7532
(0%)
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
AMD FX-8350
2,778 (6%)
AMD Epyc 7532
(0%)
Blender 2.81 (bmw27)
Blender is a free 3D graphics software for rendering (creating) 3D bodies, which can also be textured and animated in the software. The Blender benchmark creates predefined scenes and measures the time (s) required for the entire scene. The shorter the time required, the better. We selected bmw27 as the benchmark scene.
AMD FX-8350
691.35 (34%)
AMD Epyc 7532
(0%)
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
AMD FX-8350
2,149 (31%)
AMD Epyc 7532
(0%)
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
AMD FX-8350
11,167 (12%)
AMD Epyc 7532
(0%)
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
AMD FX-8350
1.16 (31%)
AMD Epyc 7532
(0%)
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
AMD FX-8350
6.97 (13%)
AMD Epyc 7532
(0%)
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-Comparison. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-Comparison’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
AMD FX-8350
5,993 (6%)
AMD Epyc 7532
(0%)
Electric Usage Estimate
Electric Usage Estimate
Popular Comparision
AMD FX-8350 vs
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
AMD FX-8350 vs
Intel Core i7-6700K
AMD FX-8370 vs
AMD FX-8350
Intel Core i5-4460 vs
AMD FX-8350
Intel Core i7-4790K vs
AMD FX-8350
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 vs
AMD FX-8350
AMD Phenom II X6 1100T vs
AMD FX-8350
AMD FX-8350 vs
AMD FX-8300
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T vs
AMD FX-8350
Intel Core i5-6600K vs
AMD FX-8350
Intel Core i5-4590 vs
AMD FX-8350
AMD FX-8350 vs
AMD FX-9590
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 vs
AMD FX-8350
Intel Core i7-2600K vs
AMD FX-8350
AMD FX-8350 vs
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
AMD Epyc 7502P vs
AMD Epyc 7532
AMD Epyc 7542 vs
AMD Epyc 7532
AMD Epyc 7532 vs
Intel Xeon Platinum 8256
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X vs
AMD Epyc 7532
AMD Epyc 7532 vs
AMD Ryzen 5 2600H
AMD Epyc 7532 vs
Intel Celeron N4000
AMD A9-9425 vs
AMD Epyc 7532
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H vs
AMD Epyc 7532
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 AF vs
AMD Epyc 7532
AMD Epyc 7532 vs
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
AMD Epyc 7532 vs
Intel Celeron J3160
Intel Core i5-4360U vs
AMD Epyc 7532
AMD Epyc 7532 vs
Apple A7
AMD FX-8350 vs
AMD Epyc 7532
Intel Xeon Gold 6132 vs
AMD Epyc 7532
Comments
