AMD Epyc 7302 | Intel Xeon Gold 6136 | |
155 W | Max TDP | 150 W |
NA | Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA |
NA | Running cost per day | NA |
NA | Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA |
NA | Running cost per year | NA |
AMD Epyc 7302 vs Intel Xeon Gold 6136
The AMD Epyc 7302 operates with 16 cores and 32 CPU threads. It run at 3.30 GHz base 3.20 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 155 W.The processor is attached to the SP3 CPU socket. This version includes 128.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 8 memory channels to support DDR4-3200 RAM and features 4.0 PCIe Gen 128 lanes. Tjunction keeps below -- degrees C. In particular, Rome (Zen 2) Architecture is enhanced with 7 nm technology and supports AMD-V, SVM. The product was launched on Q3/2019
The Intel Xeon Gold 6136 operates with 12 cores and 32 CPU threads. It run at 3.70 GHz base 3.30 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 150 W.The processor is attached to the LGA 3647 CPU socket. This version includes 25.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 6 memory channels to support DDR4-2666 RAM and features 3.0 PCIe Gen 48 lanes. Tjunction keeps below -- degrees C. In particular, Skylake Architecture is enhanced with 14 nm technology and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d. The product was launched on Q3/2017
Intel Xeon Gold 6136
Compare Detail
3.00 GHz | Frequency | 3.00 GHz |
16 | Cores | 12 |
3.30 GHz | Turbo (1 Core) | 3.70 GHz |
3.20 GHz | Turbo (All Cores) | 3.30 GHz |
Yes | Hyperthreading | Yes |
No | Overclocking | No |
normal | Core Architecture | normal |
no iGPU | GPU | no iGPU |
No turbo | GPU (Turbo) | No turbo |
7 nm | Technology | 14 nm |
No turbo | GPU (Turbo) | No turbo |
DirectX Version | ||
Max. displays | ||
DDR4-3200 | Memory | DDR4-2666 |
8 | Memory channels | 6 |
Max memory | ||
Yes | ECC | Yes |
-- | L2 Cache | -- |
128.00 MB | L3 Cache | 25.00 MB |
4.0 | PCIe version | 3.0 |
128 | PCIe lanes | 48 |
7 nm | Technology | 14 nm |
SP3 | Socket | LGA 3647 |
155 W | TDP | 150 W |
AMD-V, SVM | Virtualization | VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d |
Q3/2019 | Release date | Q3/2017 |
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-Comparison. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-Comparison’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.